Anonymous ID: f3f146 July 25, 2021, 3:53 p.m. No.14198417   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8440 >>8525

>>14198265

Until the fall of Adam, and the curse, A&E's genetics were perfect. Gradually, over time, A&E had more children. Cain married his sister, which wasn't forbidden until the introduction of Levitical Law centuries later. By the way, as a descendant of A&E, regardless of your personal preference or orientation, if you marry, you marry your relative. So it is not the big hoop-la you make it out to be.

Anonymous ID: f3f146 July 25, 2021, 4:09 p.m. No.14198522   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14198506

'Perfect in his generations' would mean Shem,

Ham, and Japheth as well, that is, those 'gen-

erated' by Noah. So I'd say his wives, and even

his daughters-in-law, get a pass on this. But

an interesting discussion point, nevertheless.

Anonymous ID: f3f146 July 25, 2021, 4:34 p.m. No.14198686   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8698 >>8747

>>14198616

The 'F-bomb' seems to be such a prolific

substitute. Somebody hates you and says,

'F you, man!' Someone is unhinged mentally

and we call them 'Crazy as F!' So, just for

clarification's sake, anon, are you saying

by your latest post, that you find sexual

intercourse annoying? In what way? I mean,

you got to be making the phrase 'annoying as

f' dependent on SOMETHING? So what, fren?

You find sexual intercourse annoying, anon?

Anonymous ID: f3f146 July 25, 2021, 4:55 p.m. No.14198798   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8807

>>14198698

Ah, yes, but anon, you simply illustrate my point!

Is the angry man suspecting he is being cheated

in some way, or is he really afraid his antagonist

is prepared to rape him? Entirely too 'iffy' in its

context, which was my point exactly.

Anonymous ID: f3f146 July 25, 2021, 5:05 p.m. No.14198844   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14198747

I thank you for the enquiry, 'F-ing' is a participle,

built upon the verb form 'F'. 'F' if you will expand

upon its spelling and look it up in an older

dictionary (Online dictionaries either define it as

crude or will not even look it up for you. Oxford

may, just to prove me wrong, I'm sure. Good

criticism, however, anon. I hope I answered it

will enough for you.

Anonymous ID: f3f146 July 25, 2021, 5:12 p.m. No.14198884   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

.>>14198793

It indeed helps in the ordinary contemplation of

the term, though dwelling upon it in my current

loveless state would probably not be helpful. But

I was discussing the treatment of people that differ from our personal ideals, and you

very cleverly changed the subject. Points to

you, but I still win the game.