>>14201184 (lb)
>>14201207 (lb)
Enlightenment may mean different things to different people. Perhaps the nature of our true relationship to/with God, and the control over narrative of how that works, is the real discussion. Many Christians have latched onto the movement citing the examples of how scripture used in drops denotes it as being a Christian movement. Others use the numerous examples in drop like these to show that this is more than that.
There was a massive migration of Christians away from Q, too. These people believe that the way this movement presented itself to them is that someone was setting up a "false prophet" type of scenario in which the original post I made sets about to destroy Biblical narratives by forcing a revelation about books like Revelation. Why would we bother to fight if the outcome is known, and if Q ideologically aligns itself with that, then why not fully endorse churches as the most important thing happening right now? Why expose all the evil doers in this world, and encourage everyone to do the same if the point wasn't to:
-
Round up truth seekers or
-
Actually bring truth to light for public consumption in preparation for the evil doers in this world to be brought to justice
I'm certain the Q movement is just as much as a moral reconciliation as it is a legal one. That moral reconciliation is on an individual basis just as much as one that focuses on justice being served in order to save humanity. Look at the drops with the word "humanity" in it, and it becomes apparent that whoever started "Q" believes in a very similar manner that a person's relationship with God is deeply personal, and unifying if taken to a logical conclusion that God is love, light, justice, and willful progress of humanity into the future by shedding this world of the control mechanisms from evil people. That's to include those that have subverted all institutions that man has set up to explore our true potential.
What would be the point of Q needing to draw comparisons between the allegorical and the realistic, using a military plan devised to do so? This is just as integral and deeply a part of the plan as the idea that evil Satanic networks are being demolished and brought to justice. Why would it be important to do this? Is the end not going to be for everyone? Why would that be? This particular thought exercise goes beyond the 4-6% lost forever, and in my opinion, starts lurching towards that 99% subject matter.
Could people really handle the fullness of the lies that have been passed down for so long? Would they be able to break through that conditioning if the truth behind it all was presented in full? Look at all the posts with "light" in them. Lots of different takes on all the many posts from people representing lots of viewpoints which the central focus is that the unifying principle of truth. Truth is all that matters, and the realization of the truth (the full truth) is now left up to the observer to decide for themselves. That to me spells "enlightenment" as much as anything else in the world.