>>14221193

It is time to start the Revolution? Or should we let it roll another election cycle?

2nd part of Q 4620 (1 yr Delta, 2 days ahead)

C19 insurance plan _above fail

C19 installed [Impeachment termination _loss of power][POTUS inside of box][prevent counter-attack].

C19 _stage 1: Inform POTUS [intel + CDC + WHO + S_advisor(s)] _nothing to fear _do not close travel _do nothing [the political ‘set up’]

C19 _stage 2: Inform POTUS of Dooms Day ‘inaccurate’ scenarios [models] predicting death count 1mm+ [the political ‘force’] _lock down [wipe economic and unemployment gains]

C19 _stage 3: Activate ‘controlled’ [D] GOVS to ‘spike’ death count + project statewide fear by presenting ‘alarming’ on-ground conditions [hospital [care-supplies] projections].

C19 _stage 4: Push testing, testing, testing to spike ‘infected’ rate incline due to daily testing inc [the political ‘set up’] _controlled MSDNC failure to report death count [rates] proportional to ‘infected’ rate _deliberate miscounting of infected numbers [%] _change non_positive to positive _label death of non_C19 as C19 _etc.

C19 _stage 5: Eliminate / censor any opposing views [anti-narrative]

[Ready when needed] Activate4-yearBLM narrative 4x power [use as division + [2020] C19 infect rates to justify close-limit until Nov 3].

C19 calculated [D] political gain:

1. Eliminate record economic gains

2. Eliminate record unemployment gains

3. Shelter Biden from public appearances _limit public exposure of mental condition

4. Shelter Biden from Ukraine exposure _narrative change _media focus C19

5. Shelter Biden from P_debates [requested demands due to C19]

6. Delay [D] convention _strategic take-over of nominee post conf

7. Eliminate_delay POTUS rallies _term energy

8. Eliminate ability for people to gather _ divide

9. Eliminate ability to find peace – strength in time of need [strict Church closures]

10. Promote mail-in-voting as only ‘safe’ method _bypass NSA election security [installed midterms +1].

11. Push state-bailout stimulus [CA][NY] + wish list items

12. Increase national debt [place China into controlling debt position _regain leverage]

13. Test conditional limits of public acceptance [obey]

14. Test conditional limits of public non_acceptance

15. Test conditional limits of State authority [Gov-mayor]

16. Test conditional limits of Media [social] censorship

Who benefits the most?

[D]?

China [CCP]?

Russia is the enemy.

China is our friend.

[MSDNC [social media] programming]

All assets deployed.

Everything seen yesterday, today, and tomorrow = calculated political moves/events designed and launched by [D] party in coordination with other domestic and foreign entities in an attempt to regain power over you.

Prevent accountability.

SHADOW PRESIDENCY [HUSSEIN]

SHADOW GOVERNMENT

INFORMATION WARFARE

INSURGENCY

Your voice and your vote matters.

Patriots stand united.

Welcome to the Revolution.

Q

>>14221450

>>14221474

>>14221482

Pay attention to "Those we [were] supposed to trust the most. Gates had a "Decade of Vaccines." Rockefeller had "Lockstep." mRNA Pharma had been working to create THIS vax for years…

A bold plan for Pope Francis, Bill Gates to save the world

Published: June 26, 2014 at 7:21 a.m. ET

Yes, Pope Francis may call Bill Gates, get Gates to bring together his friends, the 67 billionaires who are as rich as half the world, the poorest 3.5 billion. Or Gates may make the call. Doesn’t matter who puts the ball in action. Pope Francis needs help in his mission to save the global economy from the rapidly accelerating triple threat of climate change, hunger and inequality.

Fortunately Gates has a track record here: Back in 2009 he called billionaires Buffett, Rockefeller, Soros, Bloomberg, Turner, Oprah and other philanthropists to a secret meeting in the Manhattan home of Sir Paul Nurse, British Nobel biochemist and president of Rockefeller University. Again, in 2010 Gates created the “Giving Pledge” which now has 122 of the world’s Super Rich committing to give away half their fortunes in their lifetime.

And there are even more wealthy folks to work with. The world is mass-producing billionaires: Today there are 1,645 billionaires compared with 322 in 2000, with $7 trillion. Forbes says the U.S. has 492, Europe 468, China 358, Russia 111, Latin America 85, India 65, Canada 29, Africa 29, and more.

And at a time when cooperation is virtually impossible, Bill Gates’ experience offers a solution: Helping build a dream team from those 67 billionaire philanthropists, co-hosting with Pope Francis. Not so far-fetched either. Yes, Pope Francis has big issues with capitalism, but there’s still wisdom and virtue in Sun Tzu’s ancient advice to generals, keep friends close, your enemies closer. And the world certainly needs innovative solutions, fast.

Besides, the trend promises to continue. The Super Rich will get richer: Credit Suisse Bank even predicts 11 trillionaire families by 2100. They are also superoptimistic, see the UN’s population estimates of another three billion by 2050 as new opportunities with more consumers. And if excess consumption and overpopulation become problems, the Super Rich have faith new technologies will create alternative resources, greater efficiencies that will save the planet.

Yes, Pope Francis sees a different trend. But that’s all the more reason the pope should work with Gates and every billionaire ready to solve the impossible problems challenging our world

Bill and Melinda Gates are already committed, spending a fortune, changing the world. Pope Francis has the power base, the leadership skills, the authority to make things happen. Together they can rise above today’s battlefield of partisan politicians, competing anarchies, sovereign nations, dictators, myopic capitalists. Our polarized America is a perfect example of dysfunctional leadership. In the future, global teamwork will be essential for new solutions, timely action.

By 2050 at current growth rates, three critical trends will have predictably imploded in a combustible critical mass, driving us over the edge of a proverbial cliff, past the known survival limits of human civilization and a sustainable planet. This be the first time in history, says noted anthropologist Jared Diamond, where climate change is an interlocking set of “time bombs with fuses of less than 50 years,” that “if unsolved would do us great harm, because they all interact with each other … we need to solve them all,” turn off the ticking time-bomb.

more

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-modest-plan-for-pope-francis-bill-gates-to-save-the-world-2014-06-25

>>14221530

This sounds like an admission by Fauci that they didn't create Covid, but the VAX that's causing the variants.

>>14221561

Exactly. Their [PLAN]

>>14221561

>>14221570

12 SEPTEMBER 2019

The United Nations' 17 Sustainable Development Goals imply that there is no longer any need to reduce global population growth, even though it is a serious problem that undermines most of the SDG targets. By adding a further SDG aimed at slowing the increase in population, the world could yet save the UN’s 2030 Agenda.

This commentary, co-written by Population Matters Director Robin Maynard and Frank Götmark of The Overpopulation Project, was originally published on 10 September 2019 by Project Syndicate and is replicated here with their permission.

On September 24-25, world leaders will gather at the United Nations in New York to review progress toward theUN’s 2030 Agendaand its17Sustainable Development Goals. The SDGs, which aim “to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure prosperity for all,” are commendable, and summarize the kind of world many of us wish to see in 2030. But if this vision is to have any chance of materializing, governments must now add an 18th goal: “Dampen population growth.”

The challenges that humanity faces today stem mainly from overconsumption and overpopulation. Yet policymakers often fail to consider the two factors together, and largely neglect population growth in particular.

The overall human impact on the global environment is the product of population size and average per capita consumption. The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has concluded that population growth and economic (consumption) growth are the two main causes of global warming. Per capita resource consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions are highest in developed economies, while rapid population growth in developing countries contributes to the loss of forests and biodiversity.

When governments adopted the SDGs in 2015, many experts were surprised by the lack of attention to population growth. Demographer Joseph Chamie, a former director of the UN Population Division, expressed concern that the UN was ignoring the issue. University of Cambridge economist Partha Dasgupta and co-authors concurred, arguing that this omission “should be a point of public concern.” More recently, demographer Massimo Livi Bacci of the University of Florence wrote that “population … has become irrelevant for the sustainability of development, notwithstanding the evidence to the contrary.”

Between 1960 and 2000, the world’s population doubled from three billion to six billion. This growth contributed to greater pollution of land, lakes, rivers, and oceans, as well as urban overcrowding and a higher demand for agricultural land and freshwater (in turn encroaching on natural ecosystems). Despite significant technical advances in agriculture, famines killed millions of people over this 40-year period. And in developing countries, rapid population growth left poor people at greater risk of death, injury, and disease resulting from pollution, floods, droughts, and other disasters.

There are now 7.7 billion people on Earth. The UN forecasts that this figure will rise to 11 billion by 2100 (and that assumes steady fertility declines in many countries that have tended to resist this trend). A population increase on this scale would create more pollution, require a doubling of global food production under difficult conditions (including climate disruption), and result in more people suffering during conflicts and famines.

To be sure, there has been plenty of necessary research into how the world can better accommodate billions more people, in terms of pollution, agriculture, energy efficiency, and climate change. But such research fails to quantify the benefits of minimizing further population increases – a critical oversight.

more

https://populationmatters.org/news/2019/09/world-and-un-must-reduce-population-growth

>>14221633

"The TERMINATOR" and his "In - laws…"

>>14221710

What other tracker, would track WW movement?

And they laughed and called us "Conspiracy Theorists…"