Biden has the coof.
Trips of truth? Pfizer needs additional sources of revenue from actually helping people get well, as they are liable for "gene therapy" jab lawsuits?
My theory: Turns out the "virus" was re-engineered to take out DS communists and the "vaccine" increases their susceptibility.
>even if a drug will be found to treat COVID19 the contract cannot be voided.
This doesn't make sense to me. "Emergency Use Authorization" is only to be granted if the disease is "pandemic" or some such AND there are no useful therapeutics. The contract should never have been made as the "authorization" is fraudulent. The terms of the contract violate the "emergency use" designation under which the Pfizer jab was rolled out. Not to mention, that if f people are actually in a clinical trial, then denying informed consent is egregiously bad.
I think some people got placebos and the research animals in those previous studies didn't have educated "peers" working like mad to discover the means to reverse the damage or to pray for them.
https://www.natural.news/2021-07-27-nigella-sativa-black-seed-prevents-covid-damage.html
Disclosure: I already bought some of this seed oil prior to discovering it may protect against some of the damage from the "vaccine" and the "spike protein".
I think paths for lawsuits are incoming.
It does seem to me that many managers/companies are uneducated about the implications of mandates. In some cases I think calmly providing true information can turn the tide.
Do companies really want to risk the possibility of needing to constantly be vigilant about "protected" health information?