Thank you for this great bread, Baker!

>>1422811

Exactly, Anon. You get it and I get it. If it's in today's "NOTABLES" section, it's worth a comment on it for the reasons you stated. Clearly the only people upset about us providing additional details are the enemy. They clearly want the truth hidden, and they're losing. . . .

Anons, CNN posted an image of President Trump in the crosshairs today. I did a quick search of this asshole, Chris Cillizza, on the Podesta Emails database (at Wikileaks) and he's mentioned in an awful lot of emails there. Anyone got time to dig?

>>1422905

Really, Anon? 'Cause I haven't seen any of the 157 Podesta Emails mentioning Chris Cillizza posted here.

#ShutUpAndDig

https://wikileaks. org/podesta-emails/?q=cillizza&mfrom=&mto=&title=&notitle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=&noto=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult

>>1422946

Thanks for your excellent reading comprehension skills, Anon. I found 157 Podesta Emails mentioning that asshole, Cillizza, and I was asking for help digging. Thank you for correcting the wisecracker who didn't read my original post carefully before he spazzed out. Let's just #ShutUpAndDig.