>>1422848

well, what's the measure of

>something consistently egregious

?

>why complain?

that's the issue to begin with, baker spends 50% of his time and posts complaining and screaming CLOWN at anons & BV, suspiciously ranting about "muh board being comped" just like our former "friends" at a certain alt-info-channel…

serious bakers bake, they don't do that.

careful with Baker Worship: they are not gods, mere anons like us, and that can mean anyone.

every legit baker i've seen yet reacts reasonably to reasonable criticism - not this one…

>>1422964

>seriously on the fence with this issue. I don't know who is right and who is wrong.

i think that's the point…

there's been examples posted, most of what i saw was weak and seemed to confirm Clowns pissed off because they can't shit us up as much anymore, hence they scream "censorshiiiip"…

Q team can see the clowns' IPs all the way from Armenia, so i'm pretty sure they see any fuckery we should be concerned with.

Comfy.

Not comfy when bakers stir shit up.