Whoever made this, well done anon!
Then just buy Niacin vitamins and, you know, skip the whole LUNG CANCER unnecessary 'side effect'
You think that lowly of yourself?
Anakin looks the same in both pictures, one just has a face cover.
>Linked site uses cookies and "tracking technology"
But you didn't post a link to Facebook
Thanks for the 'consulting', tobacco industry.
Niacin is like 300 years past its patent lifespan, it's not a 'big pharma' product.
Who here said you 'have' to read?
I said read Godel.
I am.
I am someone who just told you to read.
You lack understanding of the truth about truths and proofs.
Imagine more lung cancer and deaths from tobacco smoke.
Lambda is greek letter for 'in place of' meaning?
Anti-
A
"big" lambda?
The tobacco companies add carcinogenic chemicals to make cigarettes more addictive.
Cigarettes are just a delivery device for nicotine, plus deadly additives.
>Cancer was negligible before vaccination was started.
No, cancer was and is much more problematic than covid.
Covid positive tests are predominantly the flu.
That's why flu numbers have become 'negligible' since covid testing.
Coincidece?
That bought 'rolling' tobacco is also carcinogenic.
>Recently discovered that cancer cells thrive on sugar
Bingo, learned that also in recent part of life too.
Ideal diet, imo, is 80% fatty acids, 15% protein, 5% veggies.
Among all smokers how many GROW their own?
Let's keep eye on the ball.
Tobacco is a death industry.
We can keep adding strings.
Symbolism won't be my downfall though, I don't rely on them to divide myself or others.
what's his stance on china's %?
yes that means it'd just a functional program, can be added to objects
>second hand smoke
yes, that's an addition to fact that the carcinogenic chemicals are air borne.
Smoke from tobacco only is still itself harmful
>Evaluate voter intent
Meaning if a vote was for Trump then there is a process available to allow someone with access to 'evaluate' that the voter 'really meant' Bidan?
What about the vote audit and uncovering of fraud that your story is meant to distract from, 'Walensky'?
You being triggered over a basic factual statement that pure tobacco smoke is harmful, makes me kek.
Don't you realize your behavior only strengthens the truth of what you're attacking a messenger for sending that message?
>You
You are projecting
Why do you 'interpret' factual statements as 'against' you?
You're assuming you're fertile enough to impregnate any and all women, and that you would ever be in such a situation in the first place.
>There is no evidence of this.
Yes, there is. Your choice to ignore the evidence does not imply it does not exist, nor would my choosing not to post it would imply it does not exist.
>That is the kind of thing that BigPharma would never allow to be studied.
Big Pharma isn't the final arbiter of all studies.
>They want people to smoke their poisoned product
You just used the word 'poison' yet in the same post you (falsely) said there is no evidence it is poison.
>Not a clean organically grown one.
What you are calling 'clean organically grown' IS STILL HARMFUL to smoke.
The world isn't made by only your mind.
>sauce?
You're asking for a source of reality outside your mind.
You just wrote fully consistent with the truth that the world isn't made by only your mind.