Do any anons know if there is a defined relationship between the value of information and the effort required to obtain it?

I'm thinking that a Go ogle search is very, very easy but highly manipulated. Meaning that the value of the information is very, very low. Censored content from Alex Berenson, however, regarding the true efficacy of "COVID-19" gene therapy jabs might be very high. High enough to make it worth paying for and risking getting censored yourself.

I want to do online research on many subjects but I'm extremely cautious about the surveillance tech and the possible manipulation of search results. A physical library might be more valuable in some ways. For example, if I'm thinking of cities I might want to move to, I already know that Go ogle, FB, Twitter, etc hate me, my views and my existence. I assume that they will misdirect me or worse, lead me into traps.

The information "superhighway" was valuable when people had the perception that it was non-discriminatory. If there are selective speed bumps for people who love God, their fellow man and their extended communities then the "information superhighway" has lost its value for me.

I'm thinking that someone somewhere has probably looked at this and might have something like an equation to describe this situation.

In any case the "free internet lunch" is over, I think.

>>14244056

Early on in the "pandemic" I found a video on this board regarding the interaction of the "virus" with a prevotella bacteria in bats. This was apparently part of some sort of cell signaling for point of use Vitamin C synthesis in bats. I gather that if the bat was past it's prime the signaling mechanism would result in the demise of the bat.

I have long believed that even if there is a "virus" or endosome involved in "COVID-19" there is another pathogen such as an intracellular bacterium, mycoplasma or something that hosts/hides the "virus".

This would explain why early treatment with HCQ reduces the likelihood of "long COVID". It would also explain why people are helped by both Ivermectin and HCQ.

If spike proteins destroy the immune system then they would make those infected with the virus or vaccinated "against" it susceptible to lots of opportunistic pathogens. Sort of like AIDS.

>>14244107

So I Lied.

Soil ied

Soiled.

>>14244119

Whoa. Interesting.

>>14244135

Yes, AIDS was the first disease diagnosed without symptoms and simply via lab "test".

Same with COVID.

I am convinced that the swabs are used to introduce a pathogen, so that lots of people told they are "positive" are getting sick FROM the "test".

>>14244143

I am doing the Vitamin C greater than 10x RDA. Vitamin D from sunlight. So, maybe I need more D.

>>14244143

Thanks for the information. I found that video to be just about the most informative I've seen regarding the truth about "COVID-19" disease.