> The belief that the courts are going to do the right thing, "this time", is proving to be the hardest nut to crack.
Agreed. When SCOTUS refused to hear TX v. PA because TX "did not have standing", that should have told
everyone that the entire judicial branch was corrupt from top to bottom (except Thomas, and maybe Alito, and
others at times). Of course TX has standing. It's plainly spelled out in the Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 2, clause 1;
The judicial Power shall extend to […] Controversies between two or more States
Unconstitutional, non-legislative changes in state voting on Federal elections certainly gave them standing.