>>14260962 pb
child molesters are usually either 1) step fathers or "uncles" or 2) homos …
>90% men
and they usually don't look like "elite Democrats"
>>>14261750
>
>I keep thinking "watch the water" means literally, "watch the water".
>
>They could add poison to their fluoride poison and really poison us!
HRC is mostly water …
think elements
watch the water
watch the earth
watch the fire
watch the air
always something fits
>>>14261810
>
>You're implying the conclusion in your premise, that's a logical fallacy.
>
>You have to prove how Q+ was lying when he dropped praise for Sessions for the SACRIFICES he made to help his country.
>
>You need to think of the ROLES people were meant to play in the long game, not your stupid Law&Order episode where everything is wrapped up in an hour.
"Q+" said/Tweeted about Sessions:
do not trust Sessions! he's cowardly bum who let me down!
"Q+" said about TRUST HUBER that he's just a do-nothing guy
how about TRUST WRAY? the dems seem to like him, is he just playing a role?
or BARR? looks like Q+ was very disappointed with him …
but you think in the end it will turn out that these guys are "White Hats" …
we are watching a movie and good actors make good movies etc
>They seem to have missed how the executions of NoName and GHWB were handled.
most of the Boomer QAnon adherents voted for NoName and GHBW
>>>14261883 (You)
>
>>"Q+" said/Tweeted about Sessions:
>
>>do not trust Sessions! he's cowardly bum who let me down!
>
>Yes, that's for optics. It's for Trump to DISTANCE himself from the man who launched the gigantic number of sealed indictments, stopped the slush funds, and stopped human trafficking networks.
>
>What did Q+ drop about Sessions to Anons?
>
>You can't win in the digital battlefield.
we know it was Trump who called Sessions a cowardly no goos bum … we don't know who "Q+" was. It was probably the same as Q.
Trump had old walls repaired and built about six miles new wall, there wasn't massive uptick in the human trafficking arrests, convictions or charges … Q said "let the unsealing begin!" so when will the unsealing of the indictments begin?
>>>14261944
>
>A great ending
in Hollywood fluff, there's always a happy ending … but in Great Art Movies, the ending is often Tragic,
every anon should watch this non Hollywood American movie about a Digital Soldier/Patriot, … the hero hasn't been red pilled on Q but otherwise it's "over the target", as you can see reading the IMDB comments
>>>14262030
>
>If we resonate together, we are unstoppable
the best, the most beautiful echo chamber
happy birthday
>The real issue are the whistleblower drops and the ships.
[D]rops before [E]vergreen before [F]ISA
Space Force DEWexecutions for the Black Hats?