Anonymous ID: 241f56 Aug. 4, 2021, 5:45 a.m. No.14266703   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6715 >>6718 >>6720 >>6723 >>6739

>>14265979 (/pb)

 

https://t.me/jim_watkins/522

 

Jim Watkins, [03.08.21 18:25]

 

[Forwarded from Midnight Rider 17 (Midnight Rider 17)]

 

[ Photo ]

 

What โ€˜realโ€™ truths are ]they[ willing to sacrifice as a major distraction? Next few weeks, youโ€™ll see major things coming out like Cuomo, the pentagon, UFOโ€™s, China, Olympics, CCP Virus, Iran, etc. in order to distract the public from AZ, cyber symposium and the Audits. While these distractions are โ€œrealโ€, itโ€™s important to have your bearing set to STRAIGHT, donโ€™t get side tracked in anything! ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธโšก๏ธ

 

โ€•โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

 

How long has the idea of information been controlled? By converting a 'psychological projection' into a manufactured dialectic that turns 'the other' against itself, through opposing dialectic forces, race vs. race, religion vs. religion, sex vs. sex, class vs. class, the reason there was control over the idea of information in the first place is because those accusatory projections were trusted as legitimate descriptions of ontological reality.

The Q project is not merely to train and inform the 'controlled' population that there is something truly sinister behind the motivations of politically connected high net worth individuals who all appear to be acting in concert to aggrandize more power and wealth for themselves through massive coordinated deception campaigns designed to 'look' real.

The Q project is to me a door that can open humanity to a much bigger truth about what has happened with humanity as a whole, and it's all based on the newest science, the science of information itself.

Imagine a group of people living in a household, where the 'older' notice that they can 'trick' the younger into fighting with each other if the older projects their own dialectic opposite tendencies and make claims, statements and accusations that when trusted end up motivating the younger to turn against each other.

Since time necessarily crystalizes all events into a permanent record, a 'true' history unfolds but only in a 'it happened this way', but not it must be emphasized 'it could only have happened this way'.

The older could 'repeat' the code of the past to continually 'remind' the younger about their 'true' history, to ensure they stay divided and continue to divide further.

Once the system here has become sufficiently complex, the system could eventually be revealed for what it really is to all house members. To prevent the realization to all that system's own language has a logic we can detect as the system talking about itself, and showing it to be inconsistent, the older could 'sacrifice' some of the 'real truths' about some of the younger to prevent the inconsistency from 'self-correcting' by way of cognition and new history making actions.

What if humanity is a unified 'system' that if it should have inconsistencies, that they are ALL a product of history of information having been controlled in the ancient dark arts practise of psychological projection from a small 2% minority 'directing' the other 98%, which at that grand and massive scale could PERSIST as inconsistent and self-destructive for centuries?

Anonymous ID: 241f56 Aug. 4, 2021, 5:58 a.m. No.14266739   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14266703

Why is it that the notion of 'untouchable' persists?

Are there individuals who by way of having 'bubbled up to the top' of a world turned against itself, should they be threatened that there is sufficient 'ammo for sacrifice' to reveal only partial truths that are designed to prevent a transfer of information between levels of 'darkness'?

>>14265979

All this "focus only on the Audit(s)" is starting to sound very very shilly.

What WOULD anti-shilling look like if shilling consisted of distractions away from audits?

Is that because you want readers to perceive actual shills as anti-shills, and the anti-shills as shills? Or you truly believe Jim Watkins is a 'shill'?

Are you expecting the string 'Board Owner is a shill' to be perceived as a true statement and 'Board Owner is not a shill' as a false statement?

>Especially when directed at Anons that have proven time and again the ability to collectively multi-task without any problems.

Without any problems? Why do you presume to be the judge of that definition?

How can you know that too much 'multi-tasking' isn't and hasn't already caused problems as compared to focus on the cult's primary weapons?

If we can't have fair and honest elections we are necessarily slaves.

Anonymous ID: 241f56 Aug. 4, 2021, 6:20 a.m. No.14266819   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14266521

Why the push for vaccines only rather than any medicine that can stop covid virus?

The push for vaccines only is not about people's health.

We are being sacrificed in real time, for the sake of money and power accrued to the very same network responsible for the virus.

Anonymous ID: 241f56 Aug. 4, 2021, 6:31 a.m. No.14266863   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14266849

You are your own projections.

If you call anons 'kikes', then you're a kike.

So the question is, why is your kikeness anyone else's problem in the digital battlefield where you can't do shit to any anons?

>>14266856

You are therefore a 'jiddish wannabe rabulist'.