Bread should be called;
Return of the Flat Earthers Edition
<Kek, they think we forget.
Yeah post it some more. Make it seem real organic.
Kek. Again, again, again!
>Though, the stuff he shares about the past makes a lot moar sense compared to the BS we've been fed.
That's how gatekeeping works. They entice you with a sprinkling of truth only to lead you down the wrong path with a kernel of lies.
>>gatekeeping
>kek
Yes, Gatekeeping. That's what gatekeepers do.
You know like Alex Jones, Corsi and Q.
Gatekeeping is an old sport, hasn't evolved a lot though.
>as you play the gatekeeper role.
That sounds like projection to me.
How am I playing the gatekeeper role? By accusing you of being a gatekeeper (or more specifically the video you posted being made by a gatekeeper)?
You're the one with a story you're trying to sell, not me.
>Happy?
No.
But it doesn't surprise me that [you] take it to that extreme. Projection at it's finest.
<Theif thinks all men steal
All 6 hours of it? No.
But the premise of the video is that it is the "real his-story (Kek, intersectionalism had to creep its way in there too) of our flat earth"
And since I reject that the earth is flat outright, I don't have to watch the video to know that I reject it. Solely on that premise alone.
There might be some good info in there. Never said there weren't. I only objected to the premise and made some fun of the fact that we've had FE shills in waves since we started this board.
>Don't let the title [de]tour you…
No… just trust a retard who will claim the earth is flat when it's so easily disproven… He must know what he's talking about. Kek
>and don't let anyone tell you what to think
>and please stop being a dumb-dumb.
Well fuck you. That's all I have to say to that.
Try looking in the mirror.
>anon have you found anyone with whom you agree 100%?
Obviously not…
>I would agree his title is unfortunate
Alright, fine.
I'm just puzzled then why it took you 15 posts to say that. When that would have ended our discussion after my first posts, had you mentioned it then. Instead of doubling down.
Please explain the "His-story" thing then?
It gives me ptsd like flashbacks of screaming blue haired land whales yelling something about "her-story".
>Because it was fun to watch you go off…
Likewise.
Also I ain't done. Please answer my question.
>have to watch for yourself.
Yeah, I'm gonna watch a 6 hour video to figure out if the author was feminist. Fucking Kek.
You've spent 16 posts arguing with me over flat earth and finally conceding that it was "unfortunate", but won't even get into the other part…
Holy fuck you're a bad shill.
>Assuming that wasn’t just old school propaganda
It obviously was… Kek.
First off. Going 10 miles up, is not enough to see what he claimed to see.
Second, air pressure and oxygen density makes it very unlikely that he survived if he attempted back then.
Thank you. As I've stated in another post. I accept this. As the other anon said "Unfortunate title".
However, it's not the only objection I have to this.
I even point it out in the post you're replying to.
Why does he call it "His-story", just like the femists/intersectionalists call it "Her-story".
Until this is explained, the video is still nothing but a propaganda piece.
>If Codemonkey were smart
>Do a test run with a dummy file to see what happens
Translated:
Do a nothingburger first though, that'll enhance your credibility.
>Normally we aren’t supposed to put our beliefs and hope behind another human…
Uhm why? Did God tell you this? Where?
If we aren't supposed to do that what would you call childhood then? Other than putting your hopes and beliefs in your parents?
You God-simps are weird some times…
Kek