Read this piese earlier:

It would be hugely beneficial both financially for the Pharmaceutical Industry and in terms of citizen tracking and control for Governments that natural immunity gets replaced by a yearly subscription type immunity. Now wouldn't it be something: To stop applying for your government controlled yearly subscribtion immunity and subsequently become immunocompromised, able to succumb from the common cold.

The way that this could go down is for our natural immune system to become addicted to this mrna/boosters drug which is to be taken every year.

Suppose the scenario in which EVERY person is under the treatment and our immune system has developed a dependency to the drug/boosters (and not taking the drug on schedule would result in withdrawal immunocompromisation).

Those behind this will certainly not come out to apologize that the treatment has this effect upon withdrawal.

Rather they will advocate that the drug is saving people, since evidently, when people on the treatment stop the treatment, they catch a cold and die.

Hence could be the reason for the mandatory push that EVERYONE is under the treatment: To prevent comparison with the untreated.

Those in the grid are to stay in the grid and abide by the rules of the grid.