Israel Conducts Biggest Airstrikes On Lebanon Since 2006

A rare, major cross-border exchange of fire between Israel and militants in Lebanon has flared-up on Wednesday into Thursday after three rockets were initially launched from southern Lebanon, which Israeli officials say struck inside Israeli territory, causing brush fires with some reports saying up to four injuries.

The Israeli Defense Force (IDF) then hit back with artillery fire on the launch positions, followed by airstrikes, reportedly on Marjayoun district in the south. "Israel responded with several rounds of artillery fire on Wednesday before launching air strikes early on Thursday," the military announced. The IDF later indicated it blanketed the target zone with over 100 artillery strikes.

"Fighter jets struck the launch sites and infrastructure used for terror in Lebanon from which the rockets were launched," the IDF statement said.

Israel also said it would hold the Lebanese government responsible for rocket fire out of the south, reminiscent of the 2006 war where Israel conducted airstrikes on Beirut for Hezbollah aggression. The Hill reports, "Avichai Adraee, the Israeli army’s Arabic-language spokesman, blamed the Lebanese government for the tensions and cautioned that there would be more attacks on Israel from south Lebanon."

Lebanese President Michel Aoun said the Israeli airstrikes were the first of their kind since 2006 (though it appears the last time was actually 2014). The IDF published footage of the overnight attack on Lebanon. President Aoun denounced the Israeli aggression and said he'll take it to the United Nations:

Aoun stated that "Israel's use of its air force to target Lebanese villages is the first of its kind since 2006, and suggests an intention to escalate attacks" against Lebanon.

"These attacks are a direct threat to security and stability in the south," Aoun added.

"What happened is a flagrant and dangerous violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 and a direct threat to security and stability in the south," Aoun said, referring to a 2006 UN motion that ended the war between Israel and Lebanon-based terrorists of Hezbollah.

Gantz's words included heavy focus on Iran throughout the interview, and said Israel stands ready to attack the Islamic Republic if a "multi-front" conflict opens up, likely to include Hezbollah in southern Lebanon.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/israel-conducts-biggest-airstrikes-lebanon-2006

>>14279993

Notable

>>14280136

Bluebeam????

Federal appeals judge: Implementing critical race theory would violate civil rights law

Judge James Ho warns agency regulators not to apply trendy legal theories to the Civil Rights Act.

Critical race theory flies in the face of the federal Civil Rights Act by presuming that racial disparities are the result of racial discrimination, a federal appeals court judge wrote in a concurrence.

A black property owner alleged that a Texas navigation district committed racial discrimination by threatening to condemn properties and conspiring with city officials to keep property values low in his neighborhood, so it could acquire them for a channel improvement project. The East End of Freeport was created as a "Negro reservation" and remains majority-minority, though Hispanics heavily outnumber blacks.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Manning Rollerson's racial discrimination claim because he didn't allege "facts supporting the contention that racial discrimination played some supporting role in the Port’s decision-making," which has a "legitimate motivation" in the need to acquire land around the Velasco Terminal.

Judge James Ho, nominated by President Trump, joined most of the opinion but wrote separately to express his concerns about "unelected agency officials usurping Congress’s authority when it comes to disparate impact theory," which lies behind Rollerson's lawsuit.

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act targets "intentional" racial discrimination, not "neutral policies untainted by racial intent that happen to lead to racially disproportionate outcomes," Ho wrote.

"There’s a big difference between prohibiting racial discrimination and endorsing disparate impact theory. … It’s the difference between securing equality of opportunity regardless of race and guaranteeing equality of outcome based on race. It’s the difference between color blindness and critical race theory."

Ho contrasted Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech, which seeks a nation where children "will not be judged by the color of their

skin," with the book "How to Be an Anti-Racist" by critical race theorist Ibram Kendi, which deems racist "any measure that produces or sustains racial inequity between racial groups."

Disparate impact theory requires looking at race to suss out racial imbalance, but the Supreme Court has held that racial balancing is "patently unconstitutional," Ho continued.

It also requires "a legal presumption that evidence of racial imbalance is evidence of racial discrimination," which runs headlong into the "bedrock" principle of innocent until proven guilty. The result is often racial discrimination in the service of balancing, he said.

"My point is simply this: If disparate impact theory is going to be incorporated into federal law, it should be done by Congress—not agency regulators," Ho concluded. "Citizens are understandably skeptical when government officials claim that they’re just here to help—but then declare that up is down, left is right, race consciousness is good, and race neutrality is bad."

Cornell law professor William Jacobson flagged the concurrence in a Monday blog post, calling Ho "a likely Supreme Court nominee when Republicans regain the White House."

Jacobson told Just the News it was the first mention of critical race theory or Kendi by name in a court opinion that he had seen. "Judge Ho’s views are constitutionally correct as well as correct under existing anti-discrimination law," he wrote in an email. "It is only a matter of time before the court system is forced to confront racism in the name of so-called 'antiracism.'"

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/federal-appeals-judge-implementing-critical-race-theory-would-violate-civil