last bread

>>1428273

Yep. They've herded you into a small corner. (Gab)

We're here, on this board, because we are the chaos factor. Maybe it's time to unleash that off this board. We're creative, we can think outside of the box, I bet we can come up with something.

>>1428277

>>Top down action, to be successful, requires bottom up push and action. They meet in the middle, at the success point.

>Like a pair of pliers - only effective if both move together toward a common goal - meeting in the middle

>>top down (POTUS/Q)

>>bottom up (anons, Patriots)

YES EXACTLY

>>1428228

>>1428228

>>1428228

>>1428228

>>1428343

Old school / low tech is powerful stuff. Like the Q post-its and fliers anons have been using.

But, leave Q off of all of them. This is broader than Q. Target audience may not have heard of Q, and "they" have already tried to sour the Q message.

End run them. Don't play into their trap.

>>1428364

>>1428403

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/03/02/ceo-jack-dorsey-want-to-improve-the-collective-health-openness-and-civility-of-twitter/

>>1428365

Helper angel.

>>1428393

Why should we concede territory and allow ourselves to be railroaded onto a shitty platform? Why not take acquire and clean up the best real estate?

>>1428408

>>1428421

Pier 39 = Fisherman's Wharf = @Jack

>>1428542

Because 1) it's conceding territory to them; and 2) the alternative is a shitty alternative, and 3) once they've herded us over there, they'll then shut that down.

>>1428580

Needs to be thrown right back at NP and Jack. We know what they're up to.

>>1428671

Quick way would be to connect 'em all to NXIVM.

>>1428704

Yeah, we've were digging on that a couple months ago. Never found Jack's secret twatter.

>>1428723

Search for Ajit Pai's statements and articles on it, and why it needed to be killed. He's the chairman of the FCC. He's got a great twitter feed.

>>1428741

No need to drag. Google has always been a major part of the plot.

>>1428759

Can we connect Jack, Zuckerberg, etc. with NXIVM?

How about targeting the major individual and institutional shareholders of Twatter, FB, Google?

For example,

Evan Williams and Peter Fenton

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/060916/top-3-twitter-shareholders-twtr.asp

Steve Ballmer (owner of the Clippers)

https://www.wsj.com/articles/steve-ballmer-is-now-one-of-twitters-biggest-shareholders-1445019499

>>1428844

Great idea. Tomorrow I'll do a dig also, including shareholder twatter handles and info on what other companies they own.

Would be fun to drive some share prices down.

.>>1428878

Cuz if @jack et al, want to take away your right / ability to talk about the fact that the cabal is poisoning our skies and water?

>>1428908

Walls have ears. (They clearly didn't reckon on Q)

>>1428963

>>1428953

I can't sauce this properly yet, still digging. But, leaning towards Boehner. Hastert was old news and long gone by the time @jack came on the scene.

Boehner, OTOH, was viewed as a highly embattled Speaker towards the end of his time in Congress. Remember how he abruptly resigned in 2015, right after he hosted Pope Frank for his speech to the Joint Session?

>>1428989

True dat. But if Q is referring to Boehner, and we're following Hastert, we're heading in the wrong direction for purposed of the current crumb.

>>1428990

IE is crap. Use something better.