All the fuss about Russian Collusion was essentially saying that somebody (purported to be Russia) had paid ads on Facebook and had so-called fake users posting opinions that favored one candidate or another.

However that was NOT election manipulation. That is because voters could still choose to ignore the messages that they did not agree with. But they did see those messages and got a chance to make their own decisions about the validity of the message.

What Twitter (shaddowbanning) and Facebook (deleting fake accounts) are doing is clear election manipulation. They are not giving voters the chance to make their own decisions and make their own choices. The essence of an election is that everyone has the opportunity to evaluate and understand the situation in their own way, and to cast their vote based on this. When a 3rd party like Twitter or Facebook interferes with this process of learning and deciding and choosing then they are clearly manipulating the election. This should be treated as a violation of the Federal Elections Act.

We need to create an #InternetBillOfRights that PUNISHES Internet businesses who use their position as an intermediary to violate any one of the rights that citizens have in the Bill of Rights. And until there are clear laws to do this, citizens should use civil class action suits to get financial compensation from these companies. I don't think blasting out a Twitter/Facebook hashtag #InternetBillOfRights counts as a storm.

There needs to be substance behind it. Explain what the rights are, why we have them, how the companies are interfering, why we need new laws to PUNISH those companies. PUT THEM IN A PICKLE because if they shadowban or delete this discussion about punishing them for illegal acts, this is as good as ADMITTING THEIR GUILT and may even be usable in a civil RICO case against them. Now that would count as a storm. Think before you go blasting away. Firing shotgun blasts at the clouds may be emotionally satisfying but will not put meat on your table.

>>1428146

Were any killed in the last few months of 2016 after the Weiner laptop was found???

Is anyone looking at this?

>>1428228

That is bullshit.

You have no understanding of how laws come into being.

Congress writes the laws, not the President.

If we want an IBOR then we need to get congressional reps on board to craft the law.

You are right that WE do not have to write the law and should not be fussing about wording.

But it wouldn't do any harm to specify some principles that Congress could refer to when writing the law.

The attached image is one example of how you could give some guidelines to Congress.

>>1428549

And here is another example of a communication bill of rights

from a slightly different context, however

if you say that you are not a DISABLED person, consider the impact

of shadowbanning and fake account deletion. Doesn't that DISABLE

you on the Internet?

We need to go through this kind of thinking in order to discover good

memes to communicate the message to people. Just blasting out

a hashtag is mostly a waste of time. Although in this case, it will

give the companies and opportunity to hang themselves by stifling the message.

>>1428355

Is that John Doerr of [ABC] Alphabet/Google speaking?

>>1428355

If this is Nancy Pelosi and John Doerr speaking

You might be interested in reading this open letter

From a Democrat who is disgusted by their involvement

In corruption

It mentions "being in your homes, attending your parties"

How many other insiders are singing now?

https://therealbackstory.com/index.php?post/Dear-Nancy-Pelosi

>>1428700

Dang it all.

Forgot that @jack had a name

Jack Dorsey and Nancy Pelosi

But they are dragging Google into their plot

>>1428365

Now this is clear famefagging

It may not be divisive but it isn't terribly useful to anyone either.

>>1428908

If this phone call happened on 5-2-2017 then they may have mentioned the Mental Health bill passed that day and it could be related to the killer of Kate Steinle on Pier 39.