Anonymous ID: 668e03 Aug. 6, 2021, 11:01 a.m. No.14284638   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4760 >>4918 >>5000 >>5296

>>14284575

tyb

----------

>>14284388 lb

REVERSE IMAGE SEARCH ON GOOGLE AND TINEYE BOTH BRING UP THESE ARTICLE NOTHING ELSE?

1) BELOW

The only other thing this image brings up is clips from the movie the gentleman (guy Richie movie recently?

--------------------

Trump vs. JFK: How similar is GOP nominee to Kennedy?

Mike Moffitt

,SFGATE

July 20, 2016

Updated: July 20, 2016 7:59 a.m.

Trump's millions: Takeaways from the New York Times investigation

Donald Trump and father Fred Trump at opening of Wollman Rink. The elder Trump supported his son heavily, the New York Times found.

New York Daily News Archive/NY Daily News via Getty Images

ALBANY — A New York Times story outlining potentially "dubious tax schemes" by President Donald Trump has drawn the attention of state officials.

Citing confidential tax returns and financial records, the special investigation reported that Trump and his siblings allegedly used sham corporations to hide millions of dollars in gifts from their parents, helped their father take improper tax deductions, and developed a plan to undervalue real estate holdings by hundreds of millions of dollars to reduce their tax burdens.

"The president's parents, Fred and Mary Trump, transferred well over $1 billion in wealth to their children, which could have produced a tax bill of at least $550 million under the 55 percent tax rate then imposed on gifts and inheritances," the story reported. "The Trumps paid a total of $52.2 million, or about 5 percent, tax records show."

Trump declined to comment on the story, but his attorney told the Times the reporting was "false." The White House issued a response late Tuesday calling the story a "misleading attack against the Trump family by the failing New York Times. Many decades ago the IRS reviewed and signed off on these transactions."

The state Department of Taxation and Finance, which is already looking into the Trump Foundation and the president's business interests, is following up on the Times' reporting.

"The tax department is reviewing the allegations in the New York Times article and is vigorously pursuing all appropriate avenues of investigation," said tax department spokesman James Gazzale.

Last month, investigators from the tax department interviewed Michael Cohen, who is assisting in investigations into his former boss.

In June, state Attorney General Barbara Underwood brought a lawsuit against the Trump Foundation, the president and his children. The action claims the nonprofit organization served as the personal piggy bank for the president's businesses, legal bills and presidential campaign.

David.Lombardo@timesunion.com - 518.454.5427 - @poozer87

Anonymous ID: 668e03 Aug. 6, 2021, 11:05 a.m. No.14284667   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Report prompts state review of Trump family's taxes

David Lombardo

Oct. 2, 2018

Updated: Oct. 3, 2018 2:25 p.m.

Trump's millions: Takeaways from the New York Times investigation

 

Donald Trump and father Fred Trump at opening of Wollman Rink. The elder Trump supported his son heavily, the New York Times found.

 

New York Daily News Archive/NY Daily News via Getty Images

ALBANY — A New York Times story outlining potentially "dubious tax schemes" by President Donald Trump has drawn the attention of state officials.

 

Citing confidential tax returns and financial records, the special investigation reported that Trump and his siblings allegedly used sham corporations to hide millions of dollars in gifts from their parents, helped their father take improper tax deductions, and developed a plan to undervalue real estate holdings by hundreds of millions of dollars to reduce their tax burdens.

"The president's parents, Fred and Mary Trump, transferred well over $1 billion in wealth to their children, which could have produced a tax bill of at least $550 million under the 55 percent tax rate then imposed on gifts and inheritances," the story reported. "The Trumps paid a total of $52.2 million, or about 5 percent, tax records show."

 

Trump declined to comment on the story, but his attorney told the Times the reporting was "false." The White House issued a response late Tuesday calling the story a "misleading attack against the Trump family by the failing New York Times. Many decades ago the IRS reviewed and signed off on these transactions."

 

The state Department of Taxation and Finance, which is already looking into the Trump Foundation and the president's business interests, is following up on the Times' reporting.

"The tax department is reviewing the allegations in the New York Times article and is vigorously pursuing all appropriate avenues of investigation," said tax department spokesman James Gazzale.

Last month, investigators from the tax department interviewed Michael Cohen, who is assisting in investigations into his former boss.

 

In June, state Attorney General Barbara Underwood brought a lawsuit against the Trump Foundation, the president and his children. The action claims the nonprofit organization served as the personal piggy bank for the president's businesses, legal bills and presidential campaign.

Anonymous ID: 668e03 Aug. 6, 2021, 11:18 a.m. No.14284765   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4785

THE TWO PEOPLE IN THIS VIDEO ARE JON SNOW T.V ANCHOR IN THE UK AND PROFESSOR JOHN BELL, EUGENICIST ARE WILL LINK THEIR IMAGES IN THE FIRST COMMENT, DETAILS BELOW !!

This video dropped by this crazy looking woman is important as they literally are talking about sterilization of the population !!

Anonymous ID: 668e03 Aug. 6, 2021, 11:22 a.m. No.14284785   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4811

>>14284765

THE 2 PEOPLE IN THE VIDEO TALKING ABOUT STERILIZATION OF THE POPULATION

Tracking down John Bell: how the case of the Oxford professor exposes a transparency crisis in government

BMJ 2021; 372 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n490 (Published 24 February 2021)

Cite this as: BMJ 2021;372:n490

Paul D Thacker, freelance journalist Author affiliations

thackerpd@gmail.com

As testing and the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine are hailed as UK pandemic successes, why won’t Oxford University or the government disclose the “long list” of financial interests of a high profile researcher at the centre of both? Paul D Thacker investigates

Since the covid-19 outbreak began early last year, John Bell, regius professor of medicine at Oxford University, has held high profile roles in the UK government’s epidemic response while also working with AstraZeneca on the vaccine.

But both Oxford and the government have refused to disclose Bell’s financial interests after The BMJ filed freedom of information (FOI) requests. More alarmingly, it appears that the government is referring media enquiries about Bell through the Cabinet Office and is scrutinising a reporter for The BMJ as it has other reporters it finds troublesome.1The BMJ has been unable to gain either direct contact with Bell or contact through his employer, Oxford University, despite multiple attempts.

The Daily Mail reported on Bell’s financial ties in September 2020, noting that he had £773 000 (€893 000; $1.1m) worth of shares in the pharmaceutical company Roche.2 The newspaper published the story after Roche sold the government £13.5m of antibody tests, which Public Health England later found to be unreliable.

--------------–

Jon Snow Journalist

Jonathan George Snow HonFRIBA is an English journalist and television presenter. He is best known as the longest-running presenter of Channel 4 News, which he has presented since 1989. On 29 April 2021, Snow announced his retirement from the role; his final programme is due to air at the end of 2021. Although Channel 4's news programming is produced by ITN, Snow is employed directly by the broadcaster. Snow has held numerous honorary appointments, including Chancellor of Oxford Brookes University from 2001 to 2008