Anonymous ID: be7089 Aug. 6, 2021, 5:08 p.m. No.14286968   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6985 >>6993 >>7025 >>7032 >>7033 >>7077 >>7098 >>7119 >>7157 >>7217 >>7248 >>7318 >>7347 >>7358 >>7463 >>7492 >>7588 >>7592

My dearest Anons,

 

I'm begging, I mean really begging, for all of you to pray! Please PRAY. My son works in a hospital and will be forced to take the vax to keep his job. He will not be able to get a job any where else because every other hospital is requiring it. He has until the September. Please pray that things change before that. Hubby-Anon and I are doing what we can. It seems all we have left is prayer.

 

Thank you Anons.

Anonymous ID: be7089 Aug. 6, 2021, 5:23 p.m. No.14287059   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14287033

From the article

https://theconversation.com/vaccine-mandates-vs-religious-beliefs-the-legal-arguments-for-the-upcoming-coronavirus-lawsuits-144047

 

โ€˜No liberty to expose communityโ€™

A requirement that someone be vaccinated imposes a greater burden on personal liberty than, say, having to attend church virtually as opposed to in person. However, as the Supreme Court stated in 1941, โ€œThe right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community โ€ฆ to communicable disease.โ€ Justice Antonin Scalia, speaking for the court nearly 50 years later, came to a similar conclusion that laws advancing civic obligations such as compulsory vaccination may override claims of religious freedom.

 

In any case, as Dr Fauci alludes to: Talk of a mandate may be moot. Almost two-thirds of the American public have said they would get the vaccine if it were available today. Should a safe, effective vaccine be developed, there will likely be tremendous demand to get the shot.

 

But should states or businesses feel it is necessary to require vaccination to bring about the end of the pandemic, I believe it is likely that courts will support them in these protective efforts.