Anonymous ID: 2ca8d3 May 16, 2018, 3:04 a.m. No.1429397   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9452 >>9604 >>9613 >>9681

Well isn't this interesting….

 

"CBS has broken its silence about recent allegations made by “NCIS” actress Pauley Perrette in which she claimed that she left the show after 16 seasons over “multiple physical assaults.”

 

As previously reported, the 49-year-old star released a series of ominous tweets days after her character’s final appearance on the fan-beloved procedural. In them, she alleged on-set abuse that she claimed was being covered up by a “machine” run by “a very rich, very powerful” publicity entity. The words were a stark contrast to the seemingly amicable split that both she and CBS previously depicted with regards to her exit from the show."

 

"“There is a 'machine' keeping me silent, and feeding FALSE stories about me. A very rich, very powerful publicity 'machine.' No morals, no obligation to truth, and I'm just left here, reading the lies, trying to protect my crew. Trying to remain calm. He did it,” she wrote on Twitter."

 

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/05/15/cbs-breaks-silence-on-ncis-star-pauley-perrettes-allegations-says-incident-was-resolved-year-ago.html

Anonymous ID: 2ca8d3 May 16, 2018, 4:42 a.m. No.1429688   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1429660

 

The interesting thing is not what happened but who's covering it up, and why, especially in the climate over the past year of metoo where that would be dangerous under normal circumstances.

Anonymous ID: 2ca8d3 May 16, 2018, 4:53 a.m. No.1429726   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1429717

 

That's an interestingly phrased statement. It could be used to justify censorship as much as, if not more, than opposing it. You believe free expression is fact, you believe every voice has some power to change the world, QED voices that would change the world in ways that you don't like disagree with should be censored.