>[5.2]
>
>[NP 8:11 “Speaker [xxxxxxx] your protection against…”]
>
>[JD 8:13 “[ABC] has an interest in this…”]
>
>[NP 8:14 “——————— Pier 39…”]
There's a video out there with jack dorsey and np (maybe pelosi) but most likely someone else interviewing @jack.
the timestamps give us a hint asto which video to look for.
I tried my luck on youtube but no success. SO FAR.
ABC may be a hint as to which network did the interview.
Help?
The View May 2, 2018 - Nicole Polizzi;Deena Nicole Cortese; Paul DelVecchio
Found this vid but timestampsdont match.
Nicole Polizzi
It's an excerpt from a convo.
The timestamps tell us what's being said at that point in time.
[NP 8:11 “Speaker [xxxxxxx] your protection against…”]
at the 8:11 mark in the vid, Nicole Pollizi says "Speaker [xxxxxxx] your protection against… "
Get it now?
>video would put statements in conversation too close together…?
Yes they would. Unless they were interrupting each other. But how likely is that?
I actually agree with you.
The logical experiment 'proved' Q.
The respondents 'got' the exact opposite.!.?
Their responses were 'classic'.
KeK.
Half the posts in this bread r just banter: KYS , shill , nigger , lurk moar , etc.
Another 37% actual shills.
Did anyone decode the latest Q post? >>1428355
Maybe what 20 - 30 posts on the subject?
The breads were so much moar tasty in FEB.