it isn't deductive argument. It is abductive, or an argument to the best explanation.
does count as some type of informal logic (where logic is taken as proper patterns of reasoning)
>Thanks, appreciate the rational reply.
while thought experiments are actually the basis of much theoretical science (labs are for confirmation) and analytic philosophy is completely driven by thought experiments and counterexamples most of the general public and many here will not understand.
if you run a thought expirement on trust sessions around the timing of his getting on board with the campaign combined with the military intelligence aspects of Trump running at all you will quickly be utterly convinced that sessions is to be trusted.
>It's surprising that the deep-state underestimated Trump.
(((they))) are a top down monolithic organization these days. the moment that the power of an organizing principle (and the deep state has an underlying set values which they organize around) is distributed into an org that is divided into functions (sometimes competing, sometime complimentary) it becomes much more vulnerable to external leverage. like pulling the right bit string….if you direct the leverage at the right places in the org that shit starts unravelling.
amatuer hour at its finest anon.