I have been an "anti-vaxxer" for a number of years and there is nothing new under the sun regarding vaccine fake news.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-coronavirus-vaccine-prevent-alzheimers-dementia-neurodegenerative-11628196831

I'm highlighting this 'editorial' because it shows, imo, some of the techniques used to coerce vaccine compliance. Though I have not looked at the studies mentioned in the piece I have an educated opinion about the techniques which may have been used to generate the fraudulent claim that vaccines prevent Alzheimer's disease.

I just want to comment that this opinion piece does not carry weight from a scientific perspective. By releasing this tentative "conclusion" in an opinion piece, those pushing vaccine uptake are "immunized" from liability and criticism when their fake news causes harm.

I have been looking into vaccines and brain damage for years now. There is no doubt in my mind that aluminum in vaccines contributes to Alzheimer's disease. The reasons the mentioned "studies" in the above opinion piece may not have discovered this are many, but "cherry picking" of studies used in meta analysis, statistical chicanery and selected elimination of data from some vaccine recipients are typical ways I've seen pro-vaccine fake news generated in the past.

Vaccines in general are associated with vastly worse health outcomes than remaining unvaccinated. The BCG vaccine mentioned in the opinion piece (which I will not deny could have benefits when used appropriately) is not used in population level vaccine programs in the US. I wonder why? Perhaps simple exposure to BCG bacteria in the environment would have similar benefits?

In any case, suffice it to say, I don't see any benefit and much harm to the liability-free vaccine products pushed en masse on populations, especially in the United States.

It is an abomination to "require" injections that do not have any liability for those making them and no recourse for those receiving them.