You'll find lots of us over on GAB. It's not the chan or even the kun, but it is a free speech choice which is not crazy invasive.
We were. Repeatedly. At one point we were down for what … 93 days? That's pretty "nuked".
>"It's not just that," Collum responds. "Serious biochemists have looked at the sequencing and said 'that does not make sense'."
How? How do you look at gene sequencing of something you haven't even isolated yet?
Make your case.
So … what genes are they looking at if not those of the virus? Maybe I've lost my edge, but I could have sworn that we were talking about the (purported) Covid virus and whether it showed signs of artificial manipulation.
At present, it's a one-way street.
LOTS of people are (probably) going to die. Whether the jabs are protective or infective, I can't say. (Before everybody gets wild on my ass, there have been articles and comments about its ability to SHIELD from 5g posted hear in the past few days by people who at least SOUND like they might know more than I.)
It's a coin toss and, for me, that coin toss has led to refusal of the experimental potion.
It's a matter of religious faith for them to marry juveniles, fuck young boys and the livestock and to rape rather freely (sexual emergency, they call it).
So your example doesn't hold.