Holy shit I didn't know they released the guy

Arizona State Sen. Tony Navarrete, accused of child sex crimes, released from jail

Published 7 hours ago

PHOENIX - FOX 10 has learned that an Arizona state senator who was arrested and accused of sexually abusing a boy and attempting to abuse another has been released from custody.

Related: State Sen. Tony Navarrete arrested for child sex crimes, lawmakers demand resignation

According to a brief statement by officials with the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, State Sen. Tony Navarrete was released from the Maricopa County Jail at around 11:30 a.m. Navarrete is out of jail on a $50,000 bond.

Navarrete accused of touching boys inappropriately

Navarrete, 35, is accused of repeatedly abusing a boy with whom he was living over a period of several years, according to court records. The boy, now 16, told detectives that Navarrete touched him inappropriately starting when he was around 12 or 13, and continuing through his 15th birthday. The teen said he suffers from anxiety and anger that stems from the abuse.

In a phone call recorded by police on Thursday afternoon, Navarrete apologized to the teen, saying he regretted his actions and would have to live with them for the rest of his life, according to the court records. When asked why he did it, he told the boy he "wasn’t well," detectives wrote.

https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/arizona-state-sen-tony-navarrete-accused-of-child-sex-crimes-released-from-jail

>>14296477

Have you noticed the Swamp Media never talks about him not conceding the election.

>>14296678

>>14296320 (You) Arizona State Sen. Tony Navarrete, accused of child sex crimes, released from jail… So if you have the money you can fuck kids or how does that work judicial branch?

Not only that did you see how low they made the bail? $50,000!? Jesus that's pittance to these political criminals.

She brings up a good point.

So your company/employer is mandating or rather forcing you to take the vaccine or be fired. What's their liability in case of serious side affects or death?

>>14296764

I was just curious. Don't think I saw anyone bring that up here or elsewhere.

>>14296764

>>14296768

COVID-19 Vaccines and Employer Liability

January 20, 2021

Employers that mandate or encourage employees to get vaccinated will likely partner with a health care provider or other authorized entity to administer the vaccine, but they may still be concerned about potential legal liability if an employee has an allergic reaction.

Ashley Cuttino, an attorney with Ogletree Deakins in Greenville, S.C., explained that an employer-mandated vaccine is considered a part of work. So under most state laws, an adverse reaction would be covered by workers' compensation.

Workers' compensation has been the employee's only recourse for other employer-required vaccinations, noted Helene Hechtkopf, an attorney with Hoguet Newman Regal & Kenney in New York City. "There is no reason to believe a COVID-19 vaccine would be treated differently," she said.

[SHRM members-only resources: COVID-19 vaccination resources]

Although injuries and illnesses from mandated vaccines are likely covered by the employer's workers' compensation policy, employers should check with their carriers, suggested John Lomax, an attorney with Snell & Wilmer in Phoenix.

Additional Liability Protections

"If an employer merely encourages employees to obtain a vaccine, coverage under workers' compensation policies may not be available," Lomax noted. But that doesn't necessarily mean that the employer would be held liable for any resulting injuries.

"Even if vaccination injury claims are not considered covered under workers' compensation laws, an employee would need to demonstrate negligence on the part of the employer," Crotty said. "If FDA [Food and Drug Administration]-approved vaccinations are administered by a third-party provider, it is difficult to see how a plaintiff would demonstrate such negligence."

Additionally, the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act may provide employers immunity from claims related to side effects of a vaccine or other injury at the employer's vaccination site if the employer is considered a "program planner" that supervises or administers an onsite vaccination program.

https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/covid-19-vaccines-and-employer-liability.aspx

So pretty all of 'em get off scott free

>>14296781

Correction: So pretty much