————————————————————-
BAKER : NOTABLE
>>1428492 Marsh v. Alabama Supreme Court decision: Private entities can't ban speech on their property if they own a monopoly on the means by which speech can take place
>Why do we actually need a separate Internet Bill of Rights? Why not simply, the Bill of Rights shall apply to communications on the internet?
Anon has a good point here…
@BO
I'm afraid newbs who come here are initlally seeing the entire catalog in a threaded view and they simply do not know that when they try to reply to something they are creating a whole new thread. The 8ch user interface can be really confusing for newbs. So they may be creating threads out of idiocy/ignorance rather than actual malice.