>>1429727

>>1428146

regarding the notable, the two detectives from NYPD.

while digging, i found the original article I had read about the NYPD chief who was "going to blow the whistle myself".

were the [2] detectives in Q's quote the anonymous "NYPD detectives" in this article?

couldn't be. Familia's was a posthumous promotion.

so as of 11/2/16, there were at least two detectives and the chief who had this evidence.

Gomez was the chief. the article specifies that he's the one quoted with 'the highest rank under commissioner'…there are multiple 'chief' titles, but only one is the highest.

so where is he now?

did the death of Familia somehow rattle him?

the other detectives?

note the similarity in the quote "we have copies of everything" from Gomez to Q's "we have everything"

>>1429972

officer maher, fwiw.

good capture, and yes, it was well discussed yesterday.

>>1430016

yeah - i'm going to guess that that last Q drop was an indication that [someone] has access to all recordings of every conversation ever.

JD and NP conversation transcript, clearly. 'protection' mentioned. [ABC] mentioned.

Jack's just a pawn, and Q is letting him know that he knows, and now we know.

>>1430069

fwiw, in teh 'conspiracy theory' world, "an abc" or "an alphabet" agency has always referred to cia/nsa/fbi/kgb/oss groups. it's a long standing catch-all.

it's why, i think, google named their group Alphabet, honestly.

so either interpretation could be valid. hope that muddies the water just enough.

i agree that

>>1430094

my guess is FBI or NSA, with a 51/49 split towards NSA.

think:

the NSA has an interest in this … (platform for monitoring your users)

>>1430163

because i'm a traditionalist idiot, and i still believe that the clowns know they can't approach domestic targets.

you're right, they're suspect, but for a politician to approach a civilian - i don't expect that pelosi would ever say that the clowns are interested in a civilian domestic asset, publicly.

(but i've been wrong before)

>>1430218

logically, though, i don't believe that pelosi would be so bold as to actually say the CIA has an interest in twitter.

but do they? of course they do.

and it doesn't matter in this context. Q's point is that Dorsey and Pelosi spoke, about protection, availability.

this is manipulation, infiltration, deceit, between the gov't and a private corp…and that is the real meat.

>>1430338

i love it when a plan falls short.

>>1430421

note the timestamp. Q pointed out that the 4:00am EST was strategic.

later that day, Richard Donoghue was named as the federal prosecutor.

important timing.

>>1430434

IBOR is a prickly bush.

you are, in essence, asking for capital-driven corps to provide rights and assurances altruistically.

the philosophy of IBOR and the mechanics of implementing an IBOR can't (i think) simply meet in the middle. too 'open', and civil discourse will be drowned out/impossible to hear. to strict, and radical-but-rational arguments are at risk of being discarded.

do we need a government funded 'public square' run by tax dollars and independently staffed?

gov't run /pol/ forum?

>>1430462

q says [4am] in this crumb, linking to that article.

i see you have it in PST, so it's 1am, but EST (where i think Q has instructed us to standardize drops) has it at 4am.

SO

to me, Q is pointing right at the article timestamp and saying to us - WHY did THIS publish at 4am. WHO publishes this kind of article at 4am?

someone who wants to escape local notice, but still wants to put it out there.

does that make any sense?