Anonymous ID: a1b2d4 May 16, 2018, 5:46 a.m. No.1429865   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9867 >>0057

>>1429809

Q calls out .@jack on 15 Feb for meeting with Pelosi. Assuming 5:2 means 2 Feb date of the meeting. Pelosi agrees that no Congressional inquiry will look into censorship, and speaks on behalf of Speaker Ryan. Then, Q let's Ryan know (in whatever way Q does these sorts of things) that Q and POTUS know that he has agreed to turn a blind eye to Twatter censorship. In mid-April, Ryan announces leaving office. To me, it appears that Ryan chose the quiet avoidance path. But Pelosi just keeps doubling down on her criminal activity. My God, she is soooooo dumb! She truly believe /they/ are gonna win this Revolution. The writing is on the wall, Nancy! Get one of your staffers to read it for you! Step. The. Fuck. Down!

.@jack, as soon as it's all out in public (Q is just waiting for optimum timing), you will be tried in the court of public opinion. Then in the criminal trial, when it comes out that you were complicit in a CIA-backed plan to control narratives, not only will you serve your time, but the civil suits are going to be staggering. Maybe if you call Q, right now, and make a deal, there might be some salvation. @snowden already has. ES & Greenburg are done. Cooked. But maybe there's a chance for you...? Worth a shot. You're going down anyway...

Anonymous ID: a1b2d4 May 16, 2018, 5:51 a.m. No.1429882   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9937

>>1429867

I actually meant 5 Feb. My reasoning is that Q calls out the meeting in mid-Feb, so the meeting had to have happened before mid-Feb. Does that make sense? Sounds like Dorsey was speaking for both himself and Goog and Pelosi was dealing on behalf of Speaker Ryan

Anonymous ID: a1b2d4 May 16, 2018, 6:13 a.m. No.1430010   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1429926

Continuing to fight is why I still have both FB and Twit. Even through censorship, the message still reaches a number of people. Your choice though anon