There is nothing in what he said that proposes a violent action. Why would you oppose such an attempt? He did in fact clearly delineate between perpetrators/collaborators vs. whistleblowers and victims. He suggests that it may be possible to rehabilitate some systems, such as honest currency, banking, energy, healthcare and senior’s comfort. There are a few ‘stretches’, such as ‘quantums’ and centralized money… however he did try very well to suggest that many other systems might be salvaged instead of what’s shaping up to be complete collapse and a new Dark Age, should a civilized Court not succeed.
Why would you poopoo such an attempt in words?