Agreed. Shills had such a good time with this first time around, they're up for another go. If Q wants this, Q needs to ask for it clearly. No one is going along otherwise, not after the last experience with IBOR. It will just get poisoned again.
This forum is not well suited for a project where a number of people have to come together and agree on a single document. Not when a goodly number of those people are shills. They take advantage of the courtesy of others to insert unacceptable language.
I can filter just fine. The problem is that shills take over and poison larger projects like trying to draft an IBOR. Meming about IBOR, what would be nice to see, no problem. Bullet points. But drafting a document? nah, that doesn't work.
This is good. This is what the board does well. Meming, not drafting docs.
We aren't the only ones concerned with internet rights. Is anyone familiar with orgs that are already deep into this whose positions we could endorse and support with some meming? EFF? Other?
The problem remains one of, if you want your shoes repaired, don't take them to an auto body shop.
That's just ridiculous.
I agree that focus is needed. Can we come up with the 4 or 5 most important things that IBOR should bring about? Right to be forgotten? Right to be free from censorship? couple more? Then meme those individually.