Defending the media now?
>>14309156 (PB) a question was asked:
>Epstein was allowed such visitors while "serving prison sentence", or NY Post
needs proof readers?
Response:
>>14309156 (PB)
>Epstein was allowed such visitors.
>Wrong!
Sincere question(?):
Why put a period on a quote which was, obviously, a question, as opposed to a statement?
The NY Post excerpt, as written by itself, did not make sense; TY for clarifying, but quoting other anons and "adjusting" their quotes isn't cool.
So what. Look at the network he chooses to work for.
CNN has more cred at this point. Even they
Wouldn't call AZ like faux did on Election Night;
So far (according to ML), have approved Mike Lindell's commercial;
Actually lets Mike Lindell talk on their shows;
Don't pretend to be a "Conservative" outlet.
OUR job should be to get faux' lower.
Our side isn't watching CNN.
Can't even mention Mike Lindell to anyone.
When CNN said crooked had 98% chance to win, ever see what faux was putting out to our side? It only got worse, too.
This is the thing. Why not go after faux as hard, if not harder, than an already deflated CNN, which only leftists watch?
Ok, 30+ poster. You win