>>14310978

>43f892

+1 for you to unfuck the dough next bread. You want a legit complaint, fine it hides the baker tools and when you follow the consolidated link list that version is several behind current. Your rule to never change a dough is a bad idea, there is an argument to not change previous nota bles, but you are doomed if you announce that you will never fix a fucked dough. While we are at, either take constructive feedback or ignore who you think are shills, your habitual method sucks and gets exploited due to your lack of restraint, something I believe we both complained about from BV.

>>14311124

Imagine constantly over-reacting and having to crawl on your belly and hide behind your flaws only to repeat the cycle all over again. Imagine doing this knowingly because you enjoy it. Imagine completely dodging constructive criticism by instead blaming ghosts.

>>14311161

>What are you trying to prove exactly?

>+1 for you to unfuck the dough next bread.

I am not your enemy

>>14311193

>over 9000 additional pylons

>>14311274

Are you actually going to take the feedback this time instead of ad hominem attacks? Are you willing to make changes to the dough? Are you suggesting that despite being here for so long you cannot tell when the dough changes, or do we have to justify line by line to get the template reverted? Penduluming between playing dumb and persona outbursts when you get specific details get very tiring very quick

>>14311335

>Find a dough from a past bread or your own supply where pic1 section looks like pic 2 section, update any changes and use that template instead. If that is against your protocols then update the highlighted link in pic1 with the correct versions of everything else in pic 2. It is a very simple and common operation to revert the template, for some reason this format keeps trying to sneak in, for months now, surely you notice this, did you ghost last night using the correct template? I am sure you did.

>>14311374

>But what's wrong with the ghostbin link?

It still links to version 0.7.3 of baker tools, that means that it has not been updated since at least April. What is wrong with it is that it has not been, and is not currently updated. General beef with the template is that it is always pushed but never updated, if you wanna change the template use something that aint broken to begin with.

>>14311415

>So wouldn't the easiest solution be to replace the baker tools link to an updated one?

>>14311362

> If that is against your protocols then update the highlighted link in pic1 with the correct versions of everything else in pic 2

Being you are the baker and you are defending this thing then you can go ahead and check and update all the other links, like you should have done before using a different dough, or revert.

Attention fellow aussies

Just finished doing the census, it is the most constitutional I have experienced and I didnt have to muck with the backend of the frontend this time. The hot tip is to try to progress every page of questions before answering anything. You will be amazed how many you have to answer and how many they want you to answer. From memory I gave: suburb, postcode and state, not even number or street name, amount of people here, amount of people not here, name of one person (I called me "householder", if you pay attention you will notice why) age, I optionally provided religion of catholic because fuck you. and that is about it. Even at the very end when you submit you do not have to check the box that all the info is correct, so I guess you could call yourself ballbags instead of householder. Spread this to your socials.

>>14311643

For bonus autism, I swear that the number and even temp password is the same from last time, I put those suckers in so many times trying to exploit the last census, I know them when I see them again.

>>14311708

And the folder grows +1

>>14311743

19 in the folder as of today.

>>14311744

So what is the story with BV anyway? Don't wanna consider baking again unless the situation has actually changed.