Anonymous ID: e8fc56 May 16, 2018, 9:30 a.m. No.1431709   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1843

>>1431670

These faggot-brained anons are so desperate for a group hug that they've talked themselves into Globalism.

This is what happens when we allow reddit transplants to police everything for the sake of muh unity.

Do you see how rapidly that idea poisons the well?

Go walk through the worst neighborhood in your city at night and see how your unity works out for you.

Grow the fuck up.

Anonymous ID: e8fc56 May 16, 2018, 9:34 a.m. No.1431760   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1798

>>1431718

"you?"

There are plenty on here who think that stupid self-serving faggot should have had mod rights taken away a long time ago.

The fact that you defend BV does nothing but hurt your credibility to anyone with half a functioning brain.

Anonymous ID: e8fc56 May 16, 2018, 9:39 a.m. No.1431814   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1851 >>1903

>>1431627

Most historians have every reason to believe Jesus existed as a historical figure.

Whether any of the claims about him are true is an entirely different matter, and you can make a very reasonable case for that being false or at least unprovable.

You think your edgelord comments make you "woke" but in reality your bias is leading you to unreasonable assumptions.

Just because you really, really WANT Jesus to have not existed, doesn't make it true. Sorry bud.

Anonymous ID: e8fc56 May 16, 2018, 9:50 a.m. No.1431931   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1962

>>1431851

So it's your assumption that a Cult was formed, won the war of ideas, and founded a religion that spread across the empire (without any institutional help for the first 300 years) and this was all done based on a guy that supposedly was their contemporaryโ€ฆwho didn't exist?

That is an extreme logical leap, and there really isn't any reason to assume that at all unless you have serious evidence of it, or you are biased.

The MUCH simpler and realistic explanation is that Jesus was an Apocalyptic Jewish teacher who traveled around and gained followers. He was executed by the state for socially unacceptable teachings and for stirring up problems. His followers, inspired by these events, began wrapping them in mythology in the following decades, which expressed a lot of philosophical revolutions that were in the zeitgeist at the time.

People like you are so fucking low effort in their opinions.

You haven't studied shit, and if you have you should be ashamed that you still manage to be so stupid.

Anonymous ID: e8fc56 May 16, 2018, 10:01 a.m. No.1432041   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1431998

BV has been caught banning users because they were criticizing BV's favorite theories at the time.

Once temp banned for this, BV spammed the board with dozens of posts, every bread, most of them unnecessarily using their trip to namefag.

 

No one cares if they ban someone who is spamming porn or gore or something.

They do not have credibility for much else.

Anonymous ID: e8fc56 May 16, 2018, 10:05 a.m. No.1432086   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1431962

He is positing that Jesus never existed, and that this is a clear fact.

I am positing that only someone who is very biased against Christianity and is looking for an insult would say that.

The common sense and historical reading is that he existed as a person, just not as a God Man.

 

We are not saying the same thing.