Anonymous ID: 766784 Aug. 10, 2021, 12:25 p.m. No.14315779   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5800 >>5844

>>14315681

Because if something is statistically impossible in one situation, you have to go back and prove that it is statistically impossible in past such situations in order to prove that it is still statistically impossible now.

 

Q.E.D.

Anonymous ID: 766784 Aug. 10, 2021, 12:54 p.m. No.14316075   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14315844

>fuckwit

 

"Statistical impossibility refers to a situation where, although there remains a mathematical "chance" that something could occur, its probability is so low - and the odds against it so enormously high - that it really cannot be admitted as a possibility in any rational argument. Practically speaking, it is impossible."

 

http://unamsanctamcatholicam.com/apologetics/84-contra-atheism/512-probability-statistical-impossibility.html

 

You're not the only moran to have studied statistics in muh university, and your manners suck donkey balls. Go fuck yourself.