From the wine lady on Telegram.
https://t.me/littllemel/7351
Modest. I like modest.
modยทest
/หmรคdษst/
adjective
1.
unassuming or moderate in the estimation of one's abilities or achievements.
"he was a very modest man, refusing to take any credit for the enterprise"
I've never seen the Government and their minions so concerned about my health and welfare. Which of course makes me very concerned.
I've actually read every story on that website. They may be fake but for sure the writer does his homework and doesn't miss a beat. I'm not sure what his intention is but there's fact in those stories many don't know mixed with the fiction. It's as trustworthy as anything from MSNBC and CNN and all the rest.
And his investigation continues. He could be arrested.
Albany Sheriff Says Criminal Probe Into Complaint Against Gov. Cuomo Could Lead To Arrest
https://gothamist.com/news/albany-sheriff-says-criminal-probe-complaint-against-gov-cuomo-could-lead-arrest
>In latest crackdown, Saudi Arabiaโs bin Salman orders arrest of 207 rivals, dissenters
August IS hot.
Nope. He has too much talent to be looking for meager handouts. Something else.
>Michael Baxter makes numerous reference to JAG officers (literally namedropping) that, if untrue, would be shut down by the USMIL for slander/ defamation
I agree. And many law firms he has referenced too. Slander and Libel be damned. There maybe more to this journal exercise. I'll keep reading it. Anyway.
> look beyond the content of the post(s) and evaluate intent.
Seems like you have RealRawNews covered. What's the intent?
I wouldn't say not at all but mostly all. Caveat Emptor.
>The U.S. Department of Labor
Marty Walsh. Former Boston Mayor just upping his game now that he made the big time.
The Enquirer is like Star Trek. They go "Where no man has gone before"
>> look beyond the content of the post(s) and evaluate intent.
>Seems like you have RealRawNews covered. What's the intent?
You give advice but don't answer questions. Allow me to answer my own question. What he writes is so close to the truth none of the many well known names and law firms mentioned in the stories want to touch it with a ten foot pole. Suing the website/writer for defamation risks eyes on. Proving what? How's that for logic.