Meta thread. Board/Administration issues go here.

>>143231

I agree completely. See Rule 6.

>>143352

Ahh, I see. Gotcha.

>>145011

Not sure what you're talking about anon, what do you mean associated to each other? It looks fine to me.

>>145401

Ohhh! Yup, you're newfagging. Post replies don't link to other threads in the browser. They will in the Ouroboros app for Android though. No big deal.

Also, try not to spam that all over the place next time. I was getting suspicious for a moment there, kek. If you're absolutely certain you found something important, then use redtext to get attention. Don't overuse it though.

>>323461

Agreed. if this AiAnon wants to dig, he can dig. That is the SOLE purpose of this board. If he wants to be weird and make annoying posts he can go to Reddit with that. Consider this board a workspace. There is no room for babysitting here.

>>323513

Who?

First of all I don't know what you're talking about because I haven't deleted anything from "Owl" anon. Second, I don't see things that way. I understand that this board belongs to all of the anons. My only job is to keep the board running in good shape and help anons stay focused. If you could elaborate more on your post I could understand what you are talking about and try to solve this issue.

>>323747

I was unaware of this. I'm going to look into this right now.

BV's. Hit me up.

Also I'm going to state it here and now in the open. BV's you are to NOT ban/delete posts from AiAnon or Owl from here on out. This board is here because anons are free to speak here, let them be free. We only defend against reported shills/attacks. If they happen to be famefagging, they will be rightfully roasted by the community.

Just keep in mind fellas, the BV's and I are racing the clock when we're here. We get tons of reports that we have to blast through, post histories to check, and issues we try to settle. We're going to make a couple mistakes here and there. We're not perfect godly beings who can't get anything wrong. We are regular dudes just like the rest of you, losing just as much sleep and losing time with friends and family due to the war. I assure you we are just as dedicated to the cause as you are.

>>324292

Fair enough Mr. Technical, I stand corrected. Have an internet, you faggot.

I also agree with your thoughts on AiAnon. Haven't heard of.. it, until now. I don't know how I end up missing these things. I am as active as time allows me to be on breads. I'm all for keeping an open mind to AiAnons unique posts if people really see value in them, wether people see them as uplifting or not. I'll keep an eye out.

>>329971

This is a META thread.

>>333647

Not sure exactly what you're talking about, but you're posting through a VPN or a proxy so it's hard for me to determine. Like >>333704 said, I think you might be posting beyond threads, which doesn't work.

Sorry, I don't use the admin@8ch email. I made a protonmail account, because I have an app that lets me keep up in real-time. I've been mobile quite a bit lately (I hope for not too much longer) so I tend to miss out on a few things.

>>421443

We do have anons doing a great job of archiving our breads. Check it out, it's awesome! http:// qarchives.ml/8qresearch_q_threads.html

>>427991

>>427971

>>428074

>>435182

I'm here.

>>552847

Banning and deleting posts from this anon will not make him go away, but provoke him further. He will move to another IP address rendering other anons filters against him useless as they will have to filter again.

>>553185

Don't worry, they will stop. Like I said, there are probably tons of anons that have filtered him by now. If I ban him and he switches to another IP, the rest of the anons will have to filter again.

Be vigilant.

>>778701

>>777753

>>811390

You mean when posting a link?

Aha I see what you mean. I'll see what I can do.

>>807116

I'm a manager too. If you have restricted access, what the fuck are you doing here?

>>888885

I must have missed that. Unfortunately, there's no way to bring back anything that has been deleted. I tend to only delete posts which have a high number of reports, and it's possible I just deleted that one after a quick skim-through.