It is not possible, sorry.
That is the nature of the chans. The catalog sliding is being cleaned up though.
Trips wont' fix the fact that anons aren't stepping up to bake and that bakers can't man the oven 24/7.
>wonderful gems of information lost in the chaff
Make a research thread if you want somewhere to dig that won't be slid, the problem of General moving fast is only going to get worse the further on we go. Consider a bakerbot.
>Why are we here?
The answer to that is unique to every individual across all Q sub-communities.
Maybe let people submit notables in another thread and it gets updated when it gets updated, maybe move notables to a different thread completely.
Digging should be done in their own threads, notables can be pulled from those threads as well and put at the top of new breads when trusted bakers have the time. Anons that dump in general should expect to be slid and if they really want it disseminated they should post it in the proper thread or submit it as a notable in the notable thread. This way there is no need to be vigilant 24/7. People can submit their own notables to the notable thread and baker can update dough when it's possible to do so. People who still want bleeding edge hive research can get it in the notables thread, people who want to talk about things in general can still do so and important posts from every thread get disseminated. This also makes it easier to sticky Q related research. I've long thought about a baker bot but didn't want to start shit with the bakers whom we appreciate.
Ultimately we may do nothing. Whatever happens will be done transparently and on our terms after hearing what everybody else has to say. Trips are disabled because it's not worth it ever. That for sure is not changing.
>Only clicked on a bookmark I had for a post. The image I sent was the result.
There's obviously an extra character in the URL, must be magic.
>Posting a different URL
It was probably removed because you posted in a blogpost slide thread, a 'Q Did you know' thread, or low effort thread meant to slide the catalog.
>Bookmarks don't go away unless the "internal" thread has been changed.
Or the thread falls off, or the thread is deleted for the aforementioned reasons. Bookmarks do not save local copies, they save locations and if there is no content at that location you will receive a 404 error.
The reason Pence is on the 404error is because CM wrote it that way.
Probably be here a while since this post is stickied.
>So this whole thing looks fishy to me.
Ok
>What if you're a clown?
Lol
>What if the qanon.pub maintainer is a clown and you both try to defame me in order to gain control?
I don't need to endorse qanon.pub for you to have bad ads.
>Or just black hat trolling to create division.
You remove your third party .js and it can potentially go back in the bake, it's not up for debate, there is no way you will get back into the bake without removing your ads.
For five dollars a month you can get unlimited bandwidth. There are no excuses for the kinds of ads that are being injected into that website. Your need for ad-revenue does not supersede our requirement to not promote things that may harm our users. We gave you an option to get your appreciated work back into the bake and if you won't take it, that's on you.
Hey API anon, I'm looking now and it appears clear to me. I see no interesting network traffic, no scripts running pointlessly plus programmers understand that they have no expectation that API's work as intended and the risks involved with such tools.
I cannot vouch for any third party website as 'good', I can only green light it as acceptable. Which this is and in the future I will namefag as BV to keep this kind of removal from happening again. I'll go post this in general.
This is the script loading intrusive ads, any post not directly addressing the ad network issue is not a post that will help qanonposts back in the bread.
I have noted your requirements and find they are much like mine. The only problem with qanonpost right now is it's maintainer is unwilling and unmotivated to address the widely reported on mobile issue.
>Who surfs the 'net with no ad-blocker, seriously?
Not an argument.
And thank you for being responsive.
>An ID for trusted Bakers?
Bakers will not be distinguished from other Anons.
I'm happy to pin a notables thread that anybody can submit notables to, we tried it before but nobody wanted to put notables there. Make a thread and start submitting notables, tell people in general to do it as well. I can't simply mandate the bakers do something another way unless it's somehow effecting our userbase. The bakers are autonomous, bring this up to them transparently in a new thread.
>Typical M.O. . they do it everywhere.
>And they do have $$$
Yes, and we can make it so they do minimal damage by having an independent notables submission thread with which the general bread posts the last n notables or notables as relevant. Comped bakes do not stop Q from posting, for all we know no bakes do not stop Q from posting.
>I haven't wanted to learn to bake since I know there is politics there and there will be fights over what is notable. And I'm too tired for that.
The only relevant politics are what Q tells us to do, everything else is unnecessary. We are focused on WWG1WGA and Patriots Stand Together, they want you divided. There is nothing off-limits to talk about here, even SES and FE are allowed to post when they can keep it to a fair signal to noise ratio. We did crackdown on spam.
We're not here to control how things are done, we're here to provide an environment where anons can chip in however they can and facilitate a neutral ground for all Q/truther communities that are here to support Q and POTUS, and sometimes even the shills are useful idiots.
>I see you guys removed the Tumbler Pigeon OS thread I made
Yeah it's not Q related, this is a research board.
>I mean, you could argue it's thread sliding/off-topic,
If I let every anon post their direct statement to Q or their open source software the entire catalog would be slid, this is a research board.
> but for 2 years worth of experimental development
I'm not seeing the relevance to your pet project and what we're doing here. If it does research let me know.
>Tumbler Pigeon is a Linux system.
What I have works nicely, your hobby OS doesn't belong here, take it to tech.
>You might have to refer to my comments there on why, but you already (likely) know Windows 10 datamines
Water is wet.
> systemd is a walking backdoor
PoC||GTFO
>Perhaps create a specific area for posting direct messages
Letters of Gratitude work, so does General.
>and everyone here literally uses an OS
No Way, I only compute with gravitational lensing and cosmic radiation.
>Arguable two separate points
<Posts Three Points
>1) Anti-datamining (no Windows 10 backdoors and based on an OS type that shuns systemd).
Again PoC||GTFO on systemd, everybody knows systemd's history. Literally everybody. We're actually touching a bit on how the OpenSource community is going to be hit by these revelations. Nobody is surprised about Windows.
>2) Anti-censorship (a major issue everyone is facing when trying to spread any kind of truthful message. Please note the updated Office 365 ToS regarding 'hate speech' and other censorship crap).
Just because you didn't directly decide to interfere with your users does not make you anti-censorship. You're advertising a non-feature.
>3) Linux based (relevant as you do archival via Linux).
That's a thread that was stickied because it clearly took quite a bit of effort. I'm sure everybody here has their own way of archiving.
>We're all doing research right now on an OS with a web browser
Yeah, and it works pretty well, and I can get tons of support with a simple search.
>Also might be worth pointing out a lot of major Linux distros have or are phasing out 32-bit support.
Now you're just throwing shit at the wall and hoping it sticks.
>I could sell the specifics of why you would want TP
And here's the heart of the problem, you're in the wrong place to be selling me anything, and frankly your pitch makes whatever you're doing smell like snake oil.
>If you really wanted to gear up TP into a research tool, I could hammer out a .sh file for it in about 5 minutes and host on GitHub.
I think people would rather have an application they can run locally, go to the quest for search-ability thread and see what they've got there.
Take your shit to /tech/.
TempleOS is the only officially licensed operating system of /qresearch/.
Naked people/porn gets spoilered. Clicking on a spoilered picture is the problem of the clicker. No it will not be removed, lest we find ourselves on a slippery slope.
I'm locking it for tonight. I'll unlock it tomorrow. Sorry for the inconvenience. Feel free to include your letters of gratitude alongside your fuck BV's below.
We're not choosing who's a 'trusted baker' and who's not.
No. It's plenty popular on it's own.
>the threads in question will still be slid
It's not on the table, whoever said prohibiting trips helps fighting hackers is wrong, it helps from people establishing cults of personality and there is no way trips will be enabled for bakers, period, what is not clear about that?
>1. Question 1: Can we possibly pin the 'Archive Everything!' thread to the first page?
It was already pinned. We're trying to keep it to research threads. Give it a good 'ol bump.
>2. Question 2: Is there a way to enable a global search function for of 8ch.net/qresearch?
Negative but there are backups of the boards available and there are people working on the 'Quest for Searchability'
>Question 3: Could we have a new pinned thread to the first page of 8ch.net/qresearch called for example; “QResearch Thread Index”.
I don't have a problem with this, nor do I have a problem with people submitting their own notables to a thread. Make a thread and drop it in general and see how it does, if it takes off to some degree we will
>Question 4: Because the Qresearch board moves so quickly, and is a prime shill target, could we add something like a dynamic guide to our top current priority research targets #1-5 (for example)?
I sticky dig threads as they come up, especially if they came up because of Q posts, but controlling the hive is not in anybodies best interest, putting the tools in place to control the hive is also not in anybodies best interest.
I do not have a problem with a centralized thread for indexing, nor a thread for notables, and we could probably use a 'Things That Don't Deserve Their Own Thread' thread as well.