calling BO or BV
I'm the current baker of Q Research and I need a bit of help.
Currently under discussion is the thought of consolidating the main header pages into one page. To do this it seems to be the consensus to create a separate thread for Q posts alone. This would require a stickie and some kind of moderation to prevent pollution by shills & clowns.
thanks
as I said in the Q Research thread.
I'd suggest you create your own board, it's not hard. take your time in the setup and then you as Board Owner can designate who can do what… who can post, who can delete posts… who can see what. Look into it.
IF a dedicated few created an archive it would be great according to its accuracy.
ATTENTION BO
Bakers by definition exercise editorial discretion with each bake.
Is there a place where a baker can catch up with your latest strategies and editorial direction?
Bakers come and Bakers go, we're all anons here and I think for this particular group it is very important that all Bakers be on the same page so to speak
carrot / stick
content / ban hammer
YOU are in charge of molding this project.
The evolution of this has been fascinating and I think as the next step you need to adopt some method to gather the appropriate group and instruct them.
Random Bakers is OK but Bakers without clear direction?
my 2¢
godspeed and thanks for all the work you've done.
I try not to make assumptions, proximity of post meaning the same as a link between posts but I guess I'm rubbing someone the wrong way. I'm trying to help, I'm trying to figure out how I can best contribute, that's all.
>post deleted
Apologies.
I will try one last time to make myself understood because I think it is important to the long term health of this project. If my contributions do not rate an answer, so be it and I'll stop and just lurk. But if things go like it looks like it's going to go, we ain't seen nothing yet.
The psychological momentum you speak of is very relevant to bread title creation wouldn't you agree?
I understand why famefagging is verboten here, it's why I stopped posting Rusty Shackelford with my work.
I'm trying to help, I'm trying to figure out how I can best contribute, that's all.
this is one recent title I can think of
>#467: Odin will extract his price edition
I'm not sure, but it seems a bit divisive from the outset, and if I'm not mistaken it's not a quote from Q
then there are the run of the mill
>#405: Bread Found Edition
>#404: Bread Not Found Edition
and general OOPS titles.
I was asking for some clear direction in this regard as I can clearly see how a title can have an effect on the general tone of the bread and it's momentum. I know I could use some clear guidance and feel fairly sure that others in my seat would at least listen. Plus it might help you more quickly spot an agent provocateur when they deviate from guidelines.
Often I'm not as succinct or eloquent as other times, so I tend to try to be understanding when people do not understand my meanings. Sometimes I'm more than a little dense. I hope this last attempt succeeds at getting across what I've been trying to say about strategy and the editorial duties of the anon in the kitchen
> spot an agent provocateur
BO do you think you can spot one?
If the actions are subtle and not easily distinguishable from "mistakes" but time and again they create the opening for the tip of the D&C wedge…
getting banned mid bake with no warning after more than a baker's dozen loaves had been created by me really opened my eyes
I saw the shitshow of the Q migrations in real time as they happened and their causes were pretty obvious to me as I had seen it before why we moved to Fred's place
I pray I'm wrong
>Tell your friend
If you are referring to me, I've tried repeatedly to have private comms with BO. email to admin@8chan on the 11th. I doxed myself, but I trust that admin, I've seen his work I didn't want to breach these thoughts on an open forum as it would exacerbate the very problem I seek to avoid.
I'm one of the unfortunate anons who does truly only have one IP available. As a board owner I know you don't see IPs just a unique hash.
Wake up, this is going to get worse.
We both realize that a certain degree of moderation is necessary here, When it's done capriciously and without explanation that moderation becomes counter productive.
For the record I do not think, nor have I ever said that anyone here is compromised. I think it's inexperience and a lack of clear guidelines from BO.
The bakers editorial decisions over what to leave in and what to prune and how to title the new bread are something that deserve some guidelines from BO. I pushed the edge by trying to reduce the bread to one post, it immediately puffed back to 3 and I've left it that way in bakes since then. Since I have access to only one IP and cannot afford a VPN (won't use a free one, you know why) getting banned is a serious matter to me.
btw
Grumpy sounds just like an anon I've seen posting on the /pol/s for years. Grumpy may very well be an AI, maybe not, I'll probably never know. What I do know is it's the very definition of a Red Herring. Combating raids IS important, determining the humanity or not of the raiders seems a bit of a lesser priority.
PPS
If you look at my ban, you'll see the reason given. Please tell me how was I to correct my aberrant behavior with those instructions? A few days later along comes delta anon… I'm from /pol/ where debate to find the truth is paramount, if you eliminate debate here, how will we find the unassailable truths? Just because one anon (or BO / BV) does not see relevance in data doesn't mean it doesn't have relevance to another anon. Trying to sort the good info from bad requires chewing the bad for a bit to make sure it's not tasty and then leaving CLEAR links to the proof it tastes bad. Constantly telling an anon to lurk moar isn't productive, pointing them to resources that will answer their question is.
>>claims IP address are known b/c
WTF???
DO YOU HAVE A MAJOR READING COMPREHENSION PROBLEM?
SEE
> As a board owner I know you don't see IPs just a unique hash.
>don't see IPs just a unique hash.
>don't see IPs
I created and own /comms/, I created it to communicate with you guys off platform so I did not inadvertently cause problems
I've begun to think you deliberately misinterpret things
.>>399767
>There's no debate, there's just derision of our Comms.
I said the best answer I'd found was Q's post 21439
I said
>mfw it SEEMS to match graphic
I've not posted anything on the delta subject since
>You know, you're a pretty hardy person.
thank you
I'm a /pol/ oldfag there are a bunch of us here that I've recognized
I've been battle hardened thru countless skirmishes. I've been forced to change my mind about long held ideas thru exposure to documented, verified truths that were contrary to the lies I'd been taught. IT hurts when you are forced to change your world view.
I'm honored to accept your apology and I offer mine as well for any offense I've caused.
My advise to you, is to relax a little and try to enjoy the ride, it's gonna get hairy as we've taken on serious enemies of many flavors, we're going to be attacked on multiple fronts.
I think I know what anons are and what they are capable of and as long as you and the others take care to be fair we'll be OK.
WE CANNOT BE DEFEATED BY OUTSIDE ACTORS.
VINCIT OMNIA VERITAS
my 2¢
from time to time give your bakers some pointers and some feedback, their power is greater than you realize. the subtle art of persuasion as taught by Edward Bernays is useful here. but only slightly as the oldfags easily spot heavy handed manipulation This is like herding cats, it must be artfully and gently if you wish to succeed in influencing their direction and as you've seen sometimes the breads do stray into non-productive states
>Sorry, I don't use the admin@8ch email.
that is understandable because only codemonkey has access
We need to talk
PM me
BO ATTENTION BO
About time!
Don't take this post at face value, check my posting history for the last month(s).
DO YOU REALLY THINK AN ACTIVE CLOWN IS GOING TO WEAR WARPAINT IN PUBLIC?
ALL of the actions can be excused as honest mistakes, plausibly deniable goofs. but were they???
If you look closely you can see the subtle direction, not so much by what was deleted and who was banned, but by what wasn't deleted and who wasn't banned.
The use of the nebulous and capricious violation of the Golden Rule that gives absolutely no guidance to correct the behavior in the future.
We tried to warn you, the damage is done, a schism occurred and may be difficult to repair.
I've repeatedly tried to communicate with you about the editorial duties of the baker and what that truly means.
Again, it's not so much what is included in each new bread, the more important part is what is not included.
Personal opinion of the accuracy of information is poison, let the board consensus rule on what is and is not accurate, that's why this place is useful, not because of one opinion trying to guide the herd, but because of the group consensus.
Look at patterns of postings not just the odd individual post if you want to understand.
MAKE THE RULES SIMPLE
MAKE THEM PUBLIC
ENFORCE THEM EQUALLY
my 2¢