Just a quick question,as stated early. I'm new here and just started posting about a week ago. I've been slow in understanding how things work. My background is in research, but, I don't know how I fit in here. My writing is more ruthless than what I see here. I tend to interject my own course of actions (what I would do) into what I find. And for example: yesterday after posting in another page, with Q's statement - Think Bigger as inspiration, instantly someone tried to hack my computer. Bottom line - I just don't know how I fit in?

https:// www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/2o60ix/the_most_important_conspiracy_book_in_decades/

This book isn't conspiracy, and Scott Bennett is a reliable source. The information probable helped with the formulation of the plan to bring down this cabal

Snow is returning to South Carolina forecasts

http://

www.

thestate.com/news/weather/article197766624.html

Q does state that we're ok? Right? But what if it still is attempted?

any FF must be exposed - WSJ Report Exposes America's Vulnerable Electric Grid

https:// www.newsmax.com/newsfront/u-spower-grid-vulnerable-break-ins/2016/07/13/id/738533/

PREDICTABILITY TOO LOW is used to indicate severe storms may be possible based on some model scenarios. However, the location or occurrence of severe storms are in doubt due to: 1) large differences in the deterministic model solutions, 2) large spread in the ensemble guidance, and/or 3) minimal run-to-run continuity.

POTENTIAL TOO LOW means the threat for a regional area of organized severe storms appears unlikely (i.e., less than 15%) for the forecast day.

http://

www.spc.noaa.gov/products/exper/day4-8/

So anything coming from this area should be considered suspicious.

Planned events by resisters (soros groups maybe?)

https:// www.resistandprotest.com/event-list

I can't find much else right now