>>14319311 (lb)
if the announcement was "we know we were raided, and who was there" and it wasn't a fully legal raid / was supposed to be secret, then the right people CANNOT ignore it.
real Watergate bait moment right thar, I'll bet.
>>14319311 (lb)
if the announcement was "we know we were raided, and who was there" and it wasn't a fully legal raid / was supposed to be secret, then the right people CANNOT ignore it.
real Watergate bait moment right thar, I'll bet.
important advice: when a compd pos agrees with you, it doesn't validate them and it doesn't invalidate your free thought.
agents of chaos will always confuse by dividing. ignore the loud ones. figure out out on your own terms.
don't know if it's sad. i know something is fucky. you know something is fucky.
are they driving out the last bits of 'knowingly'?
is the fraud so fine-and-delicate that they have to unravel it in a public way?
dunno. can't know.
keep
on
truckin.