Maybe Q or some Law people can confirm or correct me.
I believe in high profile cases especially BEFORE any evidence can be made public the jury must be selected and sequestered. If evidence is released and public perceptioin or opinion is too strong one way or another a lawyer can argue for a mistrial on the grounds no unbiased jury can be selected and everyone is tainted by what has been released.
If that is correct it could be why sessions is so quiet and rudy was so quiet for so long and why we have seen really nothing new as far as like the wiener laptop stuff is concerned.