>>14331147 pb

>Shiva today at the symposium? He said big pharma has been losing billions of dollars because drugs have to go through so much testing and take a long time to be FDA approved

what's wrong with that statement… hmmmm… let's see… where to begin…

1) shiva is a self-promoting buffoon.

2) big pharma is making $$ hand over fist.

3) ever since ronnie raygun GAVE the FDA to big pharma, they do far less testing than when they answered to the gov't (people).

4) big pharma spends way more on advertizing than they do on R&D and approval combined.

that covers the main points, i think. oh, i left out you're an idiot.

>>14332078

>You didn't refute what he said

and you can't read.

what? you your own tag team? you glow. your slide is over. KYS.

>>14332138

>we are here to help you if you allow us

NOPE! they are here to enslave us into their collective. that's why they're working overtime to get us into a NWO collective here on earth. prepare us to be assimilated. beware of borg bearing gifts. the "good" ETs have a hands off policy. if you see an actual ET here on earth, KILL IT.

>>14332205

boondock saints

>>14332221

>Telepathic contact allowed?

>Dreams and visions?

of course. direct intervention, no. shiny trinkets, no.

>>14332245

>>14332253

87% of statistics are pulled directly from the ass.

the remaining 13% are totally misunderstood.

>>14332266

>90% of peer reviewed studies are P4P ponzi schemes.

>>14332279

>I wouldn't doubt that.

WTF would you know? what peer review journals do you have subscriptions to? you couldn't even guess how many there are, fuckwit.

there are THOUSANDS of journals just in the field of chemistry. same for every other field of study.

99% of peer review articles are legit, because 99% are so trivial, no one would CARE if it were true or not.

only studies that build on accepted theory are accepted, and only if they make no more than an infinitesimal increment in knowledge.

rocking the boat is strictly verboten, and so is showing up your elders.

while it IS true that BIG science is corrupt, and the deck is stacked to push their predetermined agenda,

that is LESS than 1% of all peer review articles.

you simply have NO idea how many peer review articles are published every year. it's in the MILLIONS.

take some advice…..

if you remain silent, people might think you're stupid. but if you speak, you remove all doubt. – mark twain

>>14332366

>>14332371

so don't read it, then. no reason to announce that, unless (You) are the shill. you glow. KYS.

>>14332383

>Is drinking a box of Costco wine bad?

for who?

>>14332391

>This is a Keister Corker!

when you can't refute the facts, attack the messenger. that would classic tactics of, oh, IDK, a SHILL?

earthquake near ames, OK about 20 min ago. shallow enough to be an DUMB (3.4 km).

>>14331848