Anonymous ID: 9b32f2 Aug. 12, 2021, 6:26 a.m. No.14333616   🗄️.is đź”—kun

GHCQ Knighthood protocol

 

Your training is complete.

 

GHCQ has made your brain as smooth a snail mucus. Your job, should you chose to accept it, is to call people names on social media.

 

Kneel, Smooth brains.

 

[Candidates will kneel)

 

Rise, Sir 51 post Kike-Basher, go forth and spew.

Anonymous ID: 9b32f2 Aug. 12, 2021, 6:46 a.m. No.14333743   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>14333676

 

Gurdjieff once met Crowley. It's a famous occasion in occult circles.

 

“One day in Paris I met an acquaintance from New York who spoke about the possibilities of publishing modern literature. As I showed some interest, he offered to introduce me to a friend of his who was thinking of going into publishing, and we arranged to meet the following day at the Select in Montparnasse. His friend arrived;it was Aleister Crowley. Drinks were ordered, for which of course I paid, and we began to talk. Crowley had magnetism, and the kind of charm which many charlatans have; he also had a dead weight that was somewhat impressive. His attitude was fatherly and benign, and a few years earlier I might have fallen for it. Now I saw and sensed that I could have nothing to do with him. He talked in general terms about publishing, and then drifted into his black-magic jargon.

 

“To make a success of anything,” he said, “including publishing, you must have a certain combination. Here you have a Master, here a Bear, there the Dragon- a triangle which will bring results…” and so on and so on. When he fell silent I said, “Yes, but one must have money. Am I right in supposing that you have the necessary capital?”. “I?” he asked, “No not a franc.” “Neither have I.” I said.

 

Knowing that I was at the Prieure he asked me if I would get him an invitation there. But I did not wish to be responsible for introducing such a man. However, to my surprise, he appeared there a few days later and was given tea in the salon. The children were there, and he said to one of the boys something about his son who he was teaching to be a devil. Gurdjieff got up and spoke to the boy, who thereupon took no further notice of Crowley. There was some talk between Crowley and Gurdjieff, who kept a sharp watch on him all the time. I got the strong impression of two magicians, the white and the black- the one strong, powerful, full of light; the other also powerful but heavy, dull and ignorant. Though “black”" was too strong a word for Crowley; he never understood the meaning of real black magic, yet hundreds of people came under his “spell”. He was clever. But as Gurdjieff says: “He is stupid who is clever.”

 

Some dude opines:

 

"A clash of the teacher-egos. Gurdjieff will tell it like he is a supreme master, making Crowley wimper away with his tail between his legs, and Crowley will make it seem like Gurdjieff is an annoying crank. I find both of them to be devious rascals, each with their own insights, but I prefer Crowley (arent we on the A.C. Society website?) I can imagine what Gurdjieff whispered in that kids ear.

 

https://www.lashtal.com/forums/biography/meeting-of-the-mages-crowley-pays-a-visit-to-gurdjieff/

Anonymous ID: 9b32f2 Aug. 12, 2021, 6:54 a.m. No.14333794   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Shills, even red team shills if any, should not expose themselves to the blow back from unsupported negative assertions about others, for terrible harm to the utterer results.

 

Don't forget to null those curses!

Anonymous ID: 9b32f2 Aug. 12, 2021, 7:14 a.m. No.14333940   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3959 >>4028 >>4124 >>4145 >>4192

>>14333791

>>14333781

David Chaum has been working on this. At the photonic convenrtion (2) years ago, he gave a presentation on an retinal projection device that delivers images to the foeveal surface at higher resolution than our eyes capable of resolving which means it will not necessarily be possible to distinguish between digital and material objects in an MR environment.

Chaum invented to first digital currency back in the 90s but the 40 m deal he had with MC blew up and much recrimination ensued.

Chaum has a makerless market/digital currency conversion and messaging app

which runs encrypted on mixnet work to eliminate traffic analysis which is far more important to cultist than the message content.

Chaum is who comes up.

 

https://xx.network/cmix

 

april 10 2019

 

LOS ANGELES, April 10, 2019 /PRNewswire/ – Elixxir, led by David Chaum, the "father of online privacy," announces Elixxir's unprecedented privacy-protecting blockchain technology will be launched on a BetaNet supported by node operators on six continents.

 

The Elixxir platform will allow users to communicate without revealing metadata related to their activities—that is, Elixxir will obscure who sends messages, when messages are sent, where they are sent from and who receives them.

 

Metadata recently became a hot topic when Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg laid out a Facebook "privacy-first vision for social networking," focused on readily available end-to-end encryption with no attention to protecting metadata. In an open letter to Zuckerberg covered by Forbes, Chaum described the Zuckerberg approach to privacy as "fooling those mostly young people [Zuckerberg] says are moving off newsfeed to messaging into believing that end-to-end encryption means privacy."

 

Though end-to-end encryption obscures message contents, it does not protect the behavioral details of people's activities. Elixxir nodes, which operate a highly efficient decentralized mix network, provide full metadata protection for users as well as end-to-end encryption. The Elixxir mix network technology, invented by CEO David Chaum, delivers unprecedented speed by using precomputation to create a mix network framework in advance. After precomputation is complete, each team of nodes stands ready to rapidly process a batch of messages, quickly breaking the links between message sender and recipient, as well as links between users and their blockchain message history.

 

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/david-chaums-elixxir-delivers-first-platform-capable-of-protecting-privacy-by-obscuring-metadata-300830124.html