recall the guy who doxxed himself "intentionally" the other night. JJ.
will go find it again. hang tight.
different guy, but i hear you.
posted twice in that thread.
consider that some anons post actual connections, links, graphics, real research.
some anons connect and discuss the posted research.
some anons try to dismiss (RELEVANT) theories, and push them off to other boards.
the FE assholes were the first wave, setting up a "divisive" feeling, and when anyone wants to delve into a 'real' branch of Q posts, they have the precedent to try to push anons off to other threads (consider the P = C discussion shut-downs)
think hard about that.
isn't your wiki article referencing 'Jean Juncker', tho?
apologies if i missed something - it appears to be the same as Jean's story.
i hear you. i'm with you. i think you're right.
i am just backing your thoughts up - some of us are here for the same reasons…dig, find, truth.
and for some reason there are negs all along the way. doesn't make sense that internet randos would be so persistently negative to you, to me, in the face of such glaring obvious truth.
peace, anon.
yes, i found the guy attached to that email address, and he appears to be a different guy.
not going to just dox him completely here - hence, I THINK YOUR WIKI ARTICLE is for a different guy.
it's an interesting connection, though.
check again, dual meaning!
prove that i think it? you goofball.
email is john. your article is jean.
cox cable doesn't exist in luxembourg.
also jean doesn't post arbitrary family tree bullshit in english on message boards.