What'd you expect, a Jason Bourne film?
It's a symposium.
People are learning how to fight back.
I know you want to pretend like nothing is happening, so as to demoralize us.
We can't be demoralized.
>You're obviously Deep State agents paid to push the Q pacification op
No one said you had to live exclusively on your keyboard.
"I stand firm on what happened, this was an attack by China."
Mike just now
He's back!
This is gonna be good…
TruthHammer should make a go for the 5 million dollars then!
Its the same thing with Mike saying he was going to call out reporters in real time, so the journalists got quick to work, the articles subsequently came out like the journalists were desperate to not just get a hit piece on the symposium, but also to get their name out (which Mike even said about one in particular)
What if PCAPs were clown bait?
To give shills something to think they won one over us on?
What if Huawei link to Dominion is what overrides everything else in importance, and white hats knew this?
This particular shill is enjoying quite a bit of amusement in being completely ignorant!
>what if what if what if
It's called a hypothesis, and is how science actually works, as opposed to the appeal to authority your people enjoy abusing so much!
I'm surprised Vindman didn't demand Jack use his rank like he demanded of Devin Nunes.
>Help me here - WHY do the citizens have to prove there WAS corruption - shouldn't the government - those lying assholes we pay for - should't THEY be the ones proving THERE WASN'T CORRUPTION?
If the government is corrupt, why would you let them prove they were/weren't corrupt?
We the People have to do the heavy lifting, or else, what is the point?
>it's called moving the goalposts
>again
>cuz Armageddon didn't come this year either
What if I told you that the people waiting for something to happen aren't the same ones who are making things happen?
Would you believe it if I told you there exists a whole world of people out there, not limited to the view you get from your computer and mobile screen?
And when you realize that you and I have to understand this, what conclusion am I left to draw about you? That you're here shilling. Because everyone knows you get to answers by working through ideas. That's the essence of critical thought. That you find it easier to just lump free thinkers into a group of people who are waiting for things to happen, is that not a misjudgment on your part? Although, we both understand this, so yes, your people, being those who sent you here to shill. Prove me wrong! Engage me instead of just assuming that anyone who uses their noggin is just moving goal posts and waiting for things to happen like they are on, say, /pol/.
>With that, you now know what the "plan" truly was.
To get people involved, to begin teaching them civics, to get them out and start to take their country back LEGALLY.
What did you think, people were supposed to rise up with pitchforks? Get real!
People are being taught how to fight back in their local communities, live on OAN.
You want us to cling to notions of "taking back our country by force" as if that could even work in any organized fashion.
Given that this obviously could never happen, we would wind up just sitting around anyway.
You're the pacification op.