>>14335121 old bread
Canadian Patrick King promised to provide the court documents and transcript. Has that been made available yet?
“I WASN’T SUCCESSFUL, NO I DID NOT WIN THE COURT CASE” PATRICK KING ON PRESS FOR TRUTH!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/F6XvZCbok1SP/
In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth speaks with Patrick King in order to clear up some discrepancies in regards to what is happening with his case.
PATRICK KING FORCES AUTHORITIES TO ADMIT THEY HAVE NO EVIDENCE TO PROVE COVID19
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KD2Yo0mJWYEF/
ORIGINATING APPLICATION
file:///C:/Users/W10P/Downloads/COVID%20RELATED/2021.08.04-07.48-redvoicemedia-610aef29c1269.pdf
AFFIDAVIT
file:///C:/Users/W10P/Downloads/COVID%20RELATED/2021.08.04-07.49-redvoicemedia-610aef3334bb1.pdf
LAW Relied on by the Applicant
file:///C:/Users/W10P/Downloads/COVID%20RELATED/2021.08.04-07.49-redvoicemedia-610aef3564a95.pdf
LETTER - Deena Hinshaw v. Patrick James King, Application to be heard Monday July 19, 2021
file:///C:/Users/W10P/Downloads/COVID%20RELATED/2021.08.04-07.48-redvoicemedia-610aef29c1269.pdf
Patrick King request for evidence was unfulfilled.
https://pressfortruth.ca/i-wasnt-successful-no-i-did-not-win-the-court-case-patrick-king-on-press-for-truth/
Material evidence requested of the Chief Medical Health Officer was not on-hand and the lawyers and the judge affirmed as much, but King says the admission on the record goes further. He says the judge apologized to him and the she lamented that the Alberta population went through a lot over this.
Leading up to it the judge understood that the CMHO would have to appear in court; but the judge made a few moves that King objected to and believes he can return to the courtroom on that basis, in part.
He also says that he won in the court of public opinion to inspire Canadians to push this. The story spread by word of mouth. And he said there are three thousand pages of documents from 3 court appearances.
The Justice Centre issues a statement on issues when we receive a great deal of email on a topic and/or general misunderstanding of an issue.
AUGUST 5, 2021
https://www.jccf.ca/justice-centre-statement-about-freedom-fighter-court-victory-video/?fbclid=IwAR0N03NmO6vseuTKbs9YKOP_esTQJYg5HNnUhRKhCyLiUn5f25xQ1wUo9JQ
The Government further stated, Mr. King has “no evidence” showing that “the evidence sought from the CMOH is likely to be material” [legal term for meaning relevant and related] to the provincial court ticket received. “It is clear that Mr. King seeks evidence relating to the rationale for orders issued by the CMOH under the Act: he seeks evidence about the ‘Crafting of the statutes’,” stated the Government’s Affidavit. There do not appear to be any critical admissions by Dr. Hinshaw about the SARS-CoV-2 virus and this document has been prepared by the government’s legal team, not Dr. Hinshaw.
One of the court transcripts.
https://www.jccf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2021.08.04-07.49-redvoicemedia-610aef3334bb1.pdf
Reading through the transcript there were disputes about the police officer's interpretation of the Order under which he had fined King. The people at the park that day were in a public place particpating in a public demonstration, but the officer enforced a limitation on private gatherings. Also, the officer included King in one crowd of 22 to 32 individuals but did not define how that number represented a gathering under the Order. It could have been multiple groups of 7 or 8 individuals. In fact, the officer did not fine all of those present but just 7 individuals of which 3 were fined for having spoken to the other people.
Unfortunately for King, he was not prepared to challenge the fine on the basis of the officer's implementation. But he was right in his intention to characterize the people at the park as exercising liberty to assemble and to speak. So the fine was aimed at him because he spoke and it was on that basis that the officer selected to fine him rather than all in attendance at the park at that time. Supposedly, speaking outloud would mean King spoke to an assembled audience. But that was not established by the prosecutors.
Another factor under dispute was the nature of the Order itself. The officers said they were there to fulfill a request by the Chief Medical Officer of Health. The legitimacey of the Order was in dispute but King did not appear to contest that directly, on its own basis, although the officers acknowledged that the crowd was peacable and polite and cooperative with the officers.
Going to continue through the transcript which is fairly disjointed given that King was representing himself and was not prepared in a lawyerly way.
For clarity, the Justice Centre's statement is at the link in previous post. A short snippet was included in that post.
But after the link to 'One of the court transcripts', I left my own observations as I have begun to read the transcript. So the latter 4 paras are my comments in that post.