Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 8:33 p.m. No.14341586   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Mike Lindell Cyber Symposium - Professor David Clements "The Vote Trafficking Parable"

(1:00:29)

https://rumble.com/vl2qbo-mike-lindell-cyber-symposium-professor-david-clements-the-vote-trafficking-.html?mref=jfdjj&mrefc=5

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 8:35 p.m. No.14341603   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1616 >>1720 >>1868 >>1951 >>1968 >>2036 >>2144

Wendy Rogers

@WendyRogersAZ

When I told people to go to my website to sign the decertify petition on Mike Lindell’s live stream it crashed my website again. That is AFTER I upgraded my bandwidth. The hosting provider told me tens of thousands of people per second tried to sign the petition.

 

https://twitter.com/WendyRogersAZ/status/1426014295473762304

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 8:42 p.m. No.14341669   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1676

Seth Keshel, [12.08.21 23:16]

It is becoming painfully obvious to me, with the utter cowardice on display by the NORTH CAROLINA GOP, that the professor and I need to do an event there in a large venue similar to those seen in Michigan.

 

Anyone will the means to pull that off, state your capabilities and I’ll monitor the comments.

 

https://t.me/RealSKeshel/897

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 8:50 p.m. No.14341713   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1720 >>1736 >>1868 >>1951 >>1952 >>2036 >>2144

Arizona Conservatives Take Action, [12.08.21 23:02]

[ Video ]

Closing Arguments by Professor David Clements: The Death of the American Vote

 

With the mastery of a former prosecutor, Clements outlines:

 

• the crime

• the circumstantial evidence

• the suspected vote trafficking cartel

• the motive

• the witnesses

• confirming evidence

• the clean-up

 

Clements adds special thanks to @KanekoatheGreat🇺🇸 for providing much of the election-related video support for the presentation.

 

H/t: @midnightriderchannel

 

Rumble link đź“ş Kanekoa the Great (https://t.me/KanekoaTheGreat/1259)

 

https://t.me/ArizonaConservatives/2569

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 8:50 p.m. No.14341715   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1720 >>1868 >>1951 >>2036 >>2144

Arizona Conservatives Take Action, [12.08.21 23:26]

[Forwarded from PopulistRevolt]

Today at Cyber Symposium the Arizona Senate spoke to the entire nation about conducting a full forensic audit. PR including Nick Moseder, Behizy, Gail Golec and Jessica put together guidelines for a full forensic audit. This is the outline or playbook of the Arizona Protocol. Patriots are printing this out and emailing this to the legislators. I'm getting really strong feedback from legislators. They told me they are so appreciative for this.

 

The Arizona Audit Protocol

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IkrgasDIlNTyZzb3IO7iqs5A9-g-QSq8/view?usp=drivesdk

https://t.me/ArizonaConservatives/2570

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 8:51 p.m. No.14341717   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1724 >>1753 >>1758 >>1762

Arizona Conservatives Take Action, [12.08.21 23:39]

[Forwarded from Charlie Kirk]

[ Photo ]

Phoenix, AZ - jury selection forms for the United States District Count, in the Arizona District, are now asking potential jurors their vaccination status.

 

A jury of your peers…but only if they take an experimental vaccine.

 

https://t.me/ArizonaConservatives/2571

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 8:56 p.m. No.14341746   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1759 >>1796 >>1866 >>1868 >>1877 >>1896 >>1931 >>1951 >>1979 >>2036 >>2144

CodeMonkeyZ, [12.08.21 23:55]

[ Poll : After Tina Peters showed everybody how much of a BOSS she is, would you consider her for Congress? ]

  • Yes, Tina Peters should run for a House seat.

  • Yes, Tina Peters should run for Senate.

  • No, Tina Peters should stay as Mesa County Clerk.

  • No, I dont support her.

  • Other.

 

https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/1137

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9 p.m. No.14341766   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1868 >>1938 >>1951 >>2036 >>2144

A Sampling of Recent Election Fraud Cases from Across the United States

The Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database presents a sampling of recent proven instances of election fraud from across the country. Each and every one of the cases in this database represents an instance in which a public official, usually a prosecutor, thought it serious enough to act upon it. And each and every one ended in a finding that the individual had engaged in wrongdoing in connection with an election hoping to affect its outcome — or that the results of an election were sufficiently in question and had to be overturned. This database is not an exhaustive or comprehensive list. This database is intended to demonstrate the vulnerabilities in the election system and the many ways in which fraud is committed.

 

Continue scrolling to view the database, or Read More

 

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9:02 p.m. No.14341783   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1868 >>1921 >>1951 >>2036 >>2144

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Accurate List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases Shows 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active – And NOT ONE SINGLE COURT Has Allowed Evidence to be Argued

The 2020 election will go down as arguably the greatest fraud in world history.

The tremendously popular incumbent candidate, President Trump, was easily winning the race on election night in a landslide and then suddenly multiple states took a break, quit counting, and by the end of the week the election was flipped to Joe Biden.

Then, as the President and his team attempted to address the fraud and alleged abnormalities, the courts refused in any case evidence to be brought before a court of law.

We’ve heard over and over from Big Media that President Trump and his team lost numerous court cases linked to the 2020 election. But this is not accurate.

 

https://prepareforchange.net/2021/02/01/accurate-list-of-2020-election-fraud-cases/

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9:05 p.m. No.14341806   🗄️.is đź”—kun

1/2

November 13, 2020

A guide to understanding election fraud in 2020

By Andrea Widburg

Almost half of America's voters believe that the 2020 presidential election result reflects massive fraud in several states, including, but not limited to, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada, Georgia, and Wisconsin. This post explains the most common types of fraud.

 

Voting has two phases. Phase One occurs before votes go into the computer tallying system, and Phase Two happens inside the computer. There is mounting evidence that Democrats committed fraud in both those phases.

 

Phase one results in ineligible ballots that are fatally flawed and cannot legally be counted. For years, Democrats have been making Phase One fraud easier. Here are some of the methods they've used, often justifying them on minority civil rights grounds:

 

Motor voter registration (people are registered when they get a driver's license), creating a massive number of registered voters, most of whom don't vote.

Refusing to clean up voter registration rolls, creating millions of registrations tied to people who died or relocated.

Banning ID requirements at polling places.

Banning poll workers from comparing signatures on ballot sign-up sheets or mail-in envelopes to those on record.

Same-day registration.

Extending voting to a month-long period.

Absentee voting for anyone who desires.

Mailing ballots to every registered voter.

Voting only by mail.

Ballot-harvesting, which allows activists to collect ballots from voters and submit them. Harvesters can fill out ballots or dispose of ballots with which they disagree.

Judges and bureaucrats extending the voting deadline.

All of the above Democrat initiatives make the following types of fraud easier, particularly when paired with chicanery at the polling site, such as banning poll-observers:

 

People voting using another person's ballot.

Postal workers backdating mailed in ballots.

Insiders obtaining and completing blank ballots en masse.

Repeatedly feeding the same ballots into voting machines.

Throwing out Trump votes.

Completing incomplete ballots.

Faking same-day registrations of non-existent voters.

Throwing out mail-in envelopes to make it impossible to winnow out fraudulent ballots.

The above efforts require human agency on a ballot by ballot basis. Moreover, hand recounts will not catch them, so the same illegal votes still get counted. Trump's team has acquired thousands of affidavits proving these frauds.

 

The huge numbers, though, occur when the ballots get fed into computers. The primary computer systems used in America — Dominion and ES&S — are vulnerable to hacking, and their information is poorly secured (and, in the case of ES&S, runs through Europe and Russia). Additionally, Dominion systems have a built-in program that can automatically add a multiplier to a candidate. (For example, it could multiply every Biden vote by 1.5, increasing his count by 50%.)

 

Thankfully, computers are lousy conspirators because they cannot do things randomly. If a program forces a specific action upon a particular trigger, computers will repeat that action endlessly, affecting hundreds of thousands of votes and creating data patterns that cannot occur naturally.

 

These peculiar patterns have shown up only in swing states where Trump was winning overwhelmingly, only to have his votes instantaneously transferred to Biden or to receive zero votes from mail-in ballots. Even Democrat-heavy mail-in ballots wouldn't behave that way. These are statistical impossibilities. Here are some examples:

 

Biden's vote tallies violate Benford's law, which has been used to prove election fraud.

 

When mail-in ballots flow into the central processing area from all over a state, the ratio of votes in favor of one candidate versus another remains roughly the same, revealing itself as a relatively straight line on a graph. However, in the contested states, that line suddenly jumps improbably, as if (perhaps) 130,000 ballots all for Biden arrived simultaneously.

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9:05 p.m. No.14341809   🗄️.is đź”—kun

2/2

In Pennsylvania, over 100,000 mail-in votes showed up in the system either on the same day the ballots were mailed, the day after, or even the day before.

 

While the votes for Trump roughly coincided with votes for Republican senators, a statistically unbelievable number of votes for Biden had no relationship to Democrats senators.

 

In four Michigan counties, the more Republican a precinct, the more people voted for Biden. This pattern created a ski slope line that can occur only if a computer is programmed to steal votes for Trump and apply them to Biden.

 

In contested states, in the middle of the night, Trump stopped getting any votes and then lost votes or saw them transferred to Biden, another impossibility that can only be accounted for by computer coding. In Georgia, the Democrats went so far as to fake a water main problem to set up this fraud. (To learn more about the massive fraud in Georgia, check out Voter GA.)

 

Sidney Powell, one of the smartest women in America, believes that Democrats are using a secret CIA protocol called Hammer and Scorecard to manipulate votes.

 

And then there's this, which will be covered at greater length in another post:

 

“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” @ChanelRion @OANN

 

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 12, 2020

 

Because of the scale on which computers operate, and because of their rigidity in carrying out their tasks, when they're programmed for fraud, they leave massive anomalies that do not show up in non-contested states. This is the best evidence there is of cheating on a state-wide scale.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/a_guide_to_understanding_election_fraud_in_2020.html

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9:11 p.m. No.14341847   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1867 >>1891 >>1951 >>1985 >>1991 >>2036 >>2144

==Ten Absolute Truths About the 2020 Election and Election Fraud That Every American Should Understand Voting Machine Fraud

By LindellTV

by Kevin D. Freeman, CFA

 

Writing “10 Absolute Truths” on any subject could be considered bold, overly ambitious, or just downright arrogant. That becomes even more a consideration when writing on a controversial subject such as election fraud. Nevertheless, there are some important lessons from history, including the most recent election, that coalesce into powerful truths that we will have to face sooner or later, whether pleasant or not.

 

Truth #1: Election Fraud is real. It’s not new. But it has gotten more sinister and sophisticated.

The fact is that election fraud is a part of the human experience and has been well documented. It’s not a “conspiracy theory.” There are numerous examples of documentation, including court convictions and deathbed confessions. You can see a lot of this at a fabulous Heritage Foundation website, “A Sampling of Recent Election Fraud Cases from Across the United States.”1

 

American history is replete with colorful examples. One of those involves the “Battle of Athens,” when a group of GIs returned to their small town in Tennessee after World War II only to discover that while they were fighting for America, a mob from Memphis took over the town they loved.2 One of these war heroes responded by running for mayor but later learned the election was rigged. The GIs then broke open the town armory, blew up the jail, and forced an open counting of ballots with the whole town watching. They proved the fraud in the election and jailed the cheaters. It’s a great American story. Another example is the story of “Landslide Lyndon,” our 36th President. There’s no question that Lyndon Johnson cheated to win a close election in his first Senate race in 1948. Robert A. Caro documented this with the equivalent of deathbed confessions in the second of his massive five-volume biography of Johnson, The Years of Lyndon Johnson: Means of Ascent.3 In 1990, Dan Balz wrote that Johnson “didn’t just steal the election but pulled off a heist of historic proportions, far greater than anyone has recognized until now.”4 New York Times writer Martin Tolchin reached a similar conclusion in a book review titled “How Johnson Won Election He’d Lost.”5 In addition, there are many instances of foreign election fraud where dictators such as Kim Jong Un, Joseph Stalin, Hugo Chavez, and Nicolas Maduro won obviously fraudulent elections with massive totals and an unreasonable percentage of the vote. These are all very real facts from history. Since human nature has not changed, there is no reason to believe that election fraud has disappeared. Quite the contrary. Fraud has upped its game with modern technology, as explained below.

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9:12 p.m. No.14341849   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1867 >>1891 >>1951 >>1991 >>2036 >>2144

Truth #2: The election stakes are higher than ever before.

It’s cliché to say that “this is the most important election of our lifetimes”—but also true, because the stakes are ever increasing. We are looking at federal spending of nearly $8 trillion in 2020 with an “actual” budget deficit exceeding $4 trillion and total federal taxes well north of $3 trillion. Obviously, the COVID-19 pandemic is a big culprit. But how that money is raised and spent will have a lasting impact on our lives now and well into the future. Clearly, spending happens regardless of who occupies the White House, but the ante has just been upped—by a lot. That’s why so much money was spent in the 2020 elections—almost $14 billion on the presidential and congressional races.6 Beyond the money, America is a more divided nation than any point, perhaps, since the Civil War. This has worsened during the pandemic. There are major debates over policies such as mandated shutdowns, declarations of what is an essential business (and what isn’t), and mask requirements that have direct, personal, and long-lasting impacts on our finances and our very way of life. In addition to the hopefully short-term pandemic challenge, we also face a set of radical proposals that would permanently alter America if enacted. On the electoral front, we have heard loud voices within one party to form new states from the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico with the primary purpose of adding new Senators from their party to tip the Senate permanently in their favor. In addition, the leadership of that same party has demanded immigration changes that appear designed to provide a permanent popular majority for their party through more open borders, amnesty, and fast tracks to citizenship. Many of the same group also support abolishing the Electoral College in favor of a national popular vote. Of course, such a move would remake the electoral landscape completely. Election fraud in a single state might be sufficient to decide an election. And lest you think that the Supreme Court might rein in such ambitions, this same group has advocated a scheme called “court packing,” where the new President would add Justices to the court to guarantee a majority ruling whenever required. President Franklin Roosevelt attempted to do this in 1937 but failed.7 Finally, there are major foreign policy debates on the role America should play in the world, how we should react to China, and how we protect our nation. The differences over these issues are stark and will have a huge impact on our national security in the not-too-distant future.

 

Truth #3: Foreign actors are interfering in our elections, and that is a national security risk.

You may have grown weary of the constant refrain by Democratic politicians and the mainstream media that Russia successfully hacked our elections for Trump. We now know there is no proof of that. But what can be proven is that foreign nations, including Russia, have attempted to influence our elections for decades—including 2016—and will continue to do so in the future. According to U.S. intelligence agencies, in 2020 they upped their game despite almost knee-jerk attempts to deny it based on political bias.8 In the fog of fraud accusations, it is difficult to decipher just what role foreign powers had in the election and the impact on the outcome. There are credible allegations of Chinese involvement in voter registration drives.9 Keep in mind that any foreign involvement in elections is illegal under federal law. Beyond that, there are serious discussions regarding whether the Chinese produced fake ballots used for fraud, whether Russia or Iran attempted electronic intrusions into the electoral process, and the impact of foreign funding on our voting equipment companies.10

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9:12 p.m. No.14341851   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1859 >>1867 >>1891 >>1951 >>1991 >>2036 >>2144

Truth #4: Our electronic voting machines are vulnerable, but most are afraid to admit it.

Former Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Chris Krebs put out a very questionable early statement, reportedly written (in part) by the voting machine companies, that declared the 2020 election was “the most secure in American history.”11 That seems very strange given the evidence of irregularities compiled and presented in hearings across the country. It is even harder to swallow given the bipartisan warnings of electronic equipment vulnerabilities. I covered these extensively on my BlazeTV show (Economic War Room with Kevin Freeman) well before the 2020 vote but was by no means alone. HBO featured a tremendous documentary in March 2020, Kill Chain, on how easily hackers can breach U.S. voting machines. PBS ran a special in June 2020 titled “In Georgia, primary election chaos highlights a voting system deeply flawed.” MSNBC reported in 2019 how easy it is to hack Dominion and other voting machines.12 There have been many other press reports on how easily voting machines can be compromised.13 Democrat Senators led by Elizabeth Warren, were so concerned about the vulnerability of U.S. voting machines being hacked during the 2020 elections that they issued a formal complaint letter in December 2019.14 A frequent claim by election officials is that voting equipment is “air gapped” and not connected to the internet. This is misleading, as the Kill Chain documentary demonstrated with overwhelming evidence. In fact, some (albeit disputed) reports contend that Dominion may have been communicating with overseas servers on Election Day.15 Those who have attempted to debunk concerns about Dominion Systems, for example, make claims such as those by voting technology expert Edward Perez in the New York Times on November 11: I’m not aware of any evidence of specific things or defects in Dominion software that would lead one to believe that votes had been recorded or counted incorrectly.16 Perez apparently missed the 2018 reporting from the same newspaper when the Times’s website posted video of a Michigan professor hacking voting software and clearly showed their defects and risks.17 Any reasonable person can look at the method used to tabulate votes and recognize inherent flaws in the systems. The state of Texas did, which is why in January 2020 it rejected the use of Dominion Voting Systems products due to inefficiency and unreliability.18 You don’t have to drill down into the history of the Dominion voting machines, the manuals that demonstrate how to switch votes as a “feature” and foreign connections. You just have to accept what others were saying about the vulnerabilities before the 2020 count was awarded to Biden. Beyond that, however, it should be important to look into claims that Dominion employees carried a personal political bias against President Trump.19 Do we really want those controlling our election to be blatantly biased? The claim that a full recount rules out the notion of machine contamination, unfortunately, does not offer reassurance. Kill Chain warned Georgia officials in advance that any recount using Dominion Voting Systems equipment and software would be automatically tainted. In addition, there are reports that the firm used to conduct audits of Dominion has audited it before.20

 

Truth #5: What happened in six states was not normal or acceptable.

We have testimonies, affidavits, and video evidence of massive irregularities in the contested states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada. There are reports provided under penalty of perjury pertaining to the ejection of witnesses or requiring extreme distances from the count, failure to verify signatures, and vote-counting rule changes. Workers were told to go home, reportedly due to a burst pipe (that may have been just a clogged toilet). Security footage shows ballots pulled from suitcases hidden underneath tables—after workers were dismissed—that reportedly coincides with ballot spikes. There also was a push to delete, shred, or otherwise eliminate data from the election even as the outcome is contested.

 

It is unacceptable that witnesses to this activity have been threatened and intimidated. Yet that has been happening. If there was no fraud, why? We have a responsibility to protect our election but also to protect whistleblowers who warn us of bad behavior.

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9:13 p.m. No.14341856   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1875 >>1891 >>1951 >>1991 >>2036 >>2144

Truth #6: The science of statistics reveals unusual patterns that should be investigated.

When examining elections, it is good practice to look at the data to see if there are any unusual statistical patterns, as explained in a September 2012 National Academy of Sciences report.21 This is what we have done in reviewing foreign elections. But for some reason, there seems to be virtually no curiosity whatsoever from the mainstream media regarding this most unusual election. For example, the claim is that Biden won more votes than any American presidential candidate ever before. Yet he won the fewest counties of any previous winner. When you delve into the data, there are some unexpected patterns that raise serious statistical questions. This is the same sort of analysis that is used to find fraud in other industries. Jay Valentine, who built the eBay fraud detection system, for example, has serious issues with the 2020 election data stream, which he suggests indicates industrial-grade fraud.22

 

Truth #7: Mail-in ballots have long been recognized as a fraud risk—and with good reason.

Mail-in ballots can be legitimate, but they require generally accepted safeguards. Unfortunately, those safeguards were violated repeatedly in the 2020 election in critical locations. For example, it is crucial to have clean voter rolls and not send out ballots indiscriminately. That was not the case in this election. The evidence is overwhelming that huge numbers of unrequested ballots were sent to deceased individuals or wrong addresses, with multiple copies sent to the same person in multiple locations. According to a Heritage Foundation analysis, once ballots arrive at a home, the voter may be subject to intense coercion.23 Then, when the 2020 ballots were returned, many voting locations failed to match signatures or even check the postmark date to verify if the ballot was legally cast in the time provided. The safeguards were sadly ignored. This is consistent with the findings of a 2005 commission led by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker that concluded “absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.”24

 

Truth #8: Preventing election fraud is a civil rights issue.

There’s a reason that the 1871 “Ku Klux Klan Act” dealt with conspiracies to defraud voter rights. This is because free and fair elections are directly tied to civil rights. Candidates vie to maximize their share of the minority vote, and President Trump had a strong showing with some of the best numbers for a Republican in 60 years. If fraud were permanently introduced, however, it would greatly reduce the perceived value of minority voters, diminishing their future clout. Thus, it is imperative that we have clean elections as a matter of civil rights.

 

Truth #9: The mainstream media and social media manipulated election results by censoring political discourse.

Whether or not legal, the actions taken by both the mainstream media and social media companies to censor political debate is nothing short of despicable. This one-sided bias was evident in media coverage that clearly was anti-Trump. The Media Research Center (MRC) published a study after the election that showed that many Biden voters (in numbers large enough to have swung the election) would have voted differently if they had been exposed to a more equitable media landscape.25 As just one example from MRC, had there not been a near-total blackout on the Hunter Biden laptop story and other censored news, 17% of Biden voters nationwide would have switched to Trump—more than enough to swing the election.

 

The social media impact was even more profound. Research by Dr. Robert Epstein, a senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, claimed that search engine manipulation likely swung millions of votes from Trump to Biden.26 This occurred because most people who use Google for information assume they are getting unbiased results. Epstein claimed that, by changing the ranking of search results, Google could alter political choices, suggesting that Google acts less like an impartial utility and more like a political action committee. The bias has seemed even more blatant after the election, when Facebook and Twitter banned pro-Trump political speech, hiding behind biased fact checkers. Conservative commentator Candace Owens’s recent legal victory against fact checker PolitiFact illustrates this point.27

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9:13 p.m. No.14341857   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1875 >>1891 >>1951 >>1991 >>2036 >>2144

Truth #10: It is acceptable to question election results. In fact, it’s a necessity to maintain free and fair elections.

Despite the mass effort to challenge and silence anyone who questions election results, a willingness to question election outcomes is an important part of our democratic process. If we ever blindly accept election results without question, we will be lost. In the 2000 election, Vice President Al Gore fought the stated results all the way to the Supreme Court, finally conceding on December 13 only after the final court ruling. That was his right. You can’t dismiss a candidate’s right to use every legal means to contest an election. That’s an important safeguard. Likewise, Americans have a free speech right to express their opinion about an election. Hillary Clinton and her supporters were certainly vocal and not fact-checked into acquiescent silence about her belief that Russian collusion stole the 2016 election for Trump—even after a lengthy investigation proved otherwise. They had that free speech right to their opinion. It therefore should be acceptable to question the results of this most unusual 2020 election.

 

The Bottom Line: Nations that allow mass corruption in elections are at risk of permanently losing all liberties.

This is sad but self-evident. The risk of fraudulent elections is simply too great to “look the other way,” even once. It is a matter of national security. There should therefore be no rush to the expedient, “politically correct,” and patently false conclusion that there was not enough voter fraud in the 2020 election to affect the final results. Rather, we owe it to ourselves and our children to properly investigate and root out the fraud.

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9:45 p.m. No.14342048   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2159

1/2

Voter Fraud in Ilhan Omar’s District

 

September 27, 2020 10:10 PM

 

A Somali whistleblower working in the sheriff’s office helped O’Keefe record evidence of a cash-for-votes scheme.

 

A“ballot broker” boasts about keeping hundreds of absentee ballots in his car trunk. He brags about them being filled in by people other than the voters. Often, money changes hands. Witnesses tie the rampant fraud to the campaign chairman of a prominent member of the radical “squad” in the U.S. House. Loose election laws allow people to come from out of state, vote, and then leave again.

 

This activity is really happening in America in 2020, and it’s been captured on video by guerrilla filmmaker James O’Keefe. Some of it could be coming to swing states near you if something isn’t done.

 

A concerted effort is being made to use the coronavirus as an excuse to transform how we vote in elections by shifting to mail-in or absentee ballots. We are told that democracy will be improved if we allow ballots to be handled outside the scrutiny of election officials — and that there is almost no voter fraud, so what’s to worry about?

 

Common sense and election observers argue against any sudden shift. “Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud,” concluded the bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, co-chaired by former President Jimmy Carter. Allowing such ballots “increases the risks of fraud and of contested elections.”

 

In 2012, a grand jury in Miami-Dade County warned about the risks of absentee voting: “Once that ballot is out of the hands of the elector, we have no idea what happens to it. The possibilities are numerous and scary.”

 

Omar Escobar, the Democratic district attorney of Starr County, Texas, says that in his area the abuse of elderly citizens for their absentee ballots is such that “the time has come to consider an alternative to mail-in voting . . . something that can’t be hijacked.”

 

Guerilla filmmaker James O’Keefe is famous for having busted institutions ranging from the fraudulent voter-registration group ACORN to NPR to Google. His Project Veritas team has also piled up an impressive array of videos documenting voter fraud and how easy it is to commit it.

 

Veritas reporters found that it was easy to vote using the name of a dead person in New Hampshire. They filmed a Greenpeace activist in Colorado boasting about how he could find ballots in trash cans that could be fraudulently mailed in. In North Carolina, political operatives encouraged Veritas representatives to vote even if they were not citizens. In 2016, Veritas cameras caught Alan Schulkin, Manhattan’s Democratic election commissioner, saying, “It’s absurd. There is a lot of fraud. Not just voter fraud, all kinds of fraud.” He explained, “They put [people] in a bus and go from poll site to poll site.” Schulkin was promptly fired for his candor by New York City mayor Bill de Blasio.

 

Now O’Keefe has trained his cameras on “ballot harvesting,” in which third parties collect mail-in ballots and deliver them to election officials. While illegal in some states, it is legal in California and other states. The individual collecting the ballots can even be a paid campaign worker for someone who is on the ballot. So-called ballot brokers will target certain communities, apartment complexes, or nursing homes to collect votes for their political party.

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9:45 p.m. No.14342049   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2159

2/2

O’Keefe has uncovered what appears to be a massive ongoing voter-fraud scheme in Minneapolis. It is linked to the political machine of Ilhan Omar, the congresswoman from Minnesota’s fifth district (Minneapolis) and a close ally of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in the U.S. House.

 

Omar was first elected in 2018 and quickly became a controversial figure, rebuked for her anti-Semitic remarks and accused of shady campaign spending and having committed immigration fraud by marrying her brother. In 2020, she was challenged by Antone Melton-Meaux, a lawyer who promised to pay less attention to national progressive politics and who ran on the campaign slogan “Focused on the Fifth.” He was endorsed by the Minneapolis Star Tribune editorial board and former Minneapolis NAACP president Nekima Levy-Armstrong.

 

Melton-Meaux wound up losing in the August Democratic primary, 57 percent to 39 percent.

 

Many people believe that Omar’s complete domination of the district’s politics is rooted in her machine’s ability to fool, seduce, or bribe members of her Somali community into committing voter fraud.

 

Minnesota law forbids anyone from “ballot harvesting” more than three ballots in an election. So why does Liban Mohamed, a “ballot broker,” boast about having 300 ballots in his car from the August primary, many of them blank and some opened? “Money is everything,” he laughs on the video. Activists describe how people receive cash when they hand their absentee ballot over so it can be filled out.

 

A. J. Awed, a Somali who was a losing candidate for city council in Minneapolis’s Ward 6, is shocked at the “corruption” he sees. He calls Omar’s machine “an alliance between [her] clan and the progressive Left.” A Somali political activist says the state’s Democratic Party knows all about the schemes. She describes how Somalis have long moved in from out of state and temporarily established residence and then voted on Election Day, with local campaign workers “vouching” for them. They then disappear and go back to their real homes and their normal lives. Now, with the loosening of mail-in ballot laws, cheating is even easier.

 

O’Keefe’s guide and facilitator in making these undercover videos is Omar Jamal. A Somali American, Jamal works for the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office and also runs the Somali Watchdog Group, which fights corruption by some of the community’s leaders.

 

O’Keefe’s sources say the practices that O’Keefe describes are organized by Ali (Isse) Gainey, Ilhan Omar’s deputy district director. Isse has served critical roles in Omar’s two successful congressional campaigns as the field organizer for her Minnesota House race and the outreach director for her first congressional campaign. Jamal says that Omar is “victimizing her own community and undermining election integrity.”

 

Nor is the corruption new. Phyllis Kahn, a Democratic state representative in Minneapolis for 44 years until Omar defeated her in 2016, has long complained about voter fraud tied to Omar’s machine; she believes that fraud contributed to her sudden defeat.

 

Nor is Kahn the only Democrat concerned that voter fraud exists and is seriously undermining our elections. Representative Tulsi Gabbard, the Hawaii Democrat who made a mild splash as a presidential candidate this year, has become a lead co-sponsor of a bill to withdraw federal election assistance from states that allow ballot harvesting. Her Republican counterpart on the Election Fraud Prevention Act is Illinois Republican Rodney Davis.

 

“Banning ballot harvesting is not a partisan issue . . . and it is ripe for fraud,” she says in a video. “It poses a serious threat to the integrity of our elections.”

 

Omar Jamal is even more blunt. “If American people don’t pay attention to what’s happening, soon the country will collapse,” he warns. “The rules and regulations, if you ignore that, and you let corruption and fraud become a daily business, then tough luck. The country will not exist as they know it.”

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/09/new-project-veritas-video-voter-fraud-in-ilhan-omars-district/

Anonymous ID: 0b7dba Aug. 12, 2021, 9:46 p.m. No.14342053   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2105

Tweet

See new Tweets

Conversation

Wendy Rogers Retweeted

Wendy Rogers

@WendyRogersAZ

White heavy check mark Encrypted watermarks

White heavy check mark No more machines

White heavy check mark Precinct level counting only - not county level

White heavy check mark No more mail ins other than military and disabled/sick

White heavy check mark Mandatory forensic audits if even a hint of an issue

White heavy check mark Swift accountability and jail time for those who violated the law

 

https://twitter.com/WendyRogersAZ/status/1419475036923174912