Anonymous ID: 9eb4dc Aug. 12, 2021, 11:38 p.m. No.14342548   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2598 >>2614 >>2615 >>2711

This is a little late, but I'm not sure if anyone else noticed this.

 

I was checking the list of board members for the WHO's Global Health Preparedness Board and noticed that Anthony Fauci was listed as a FORMER member.

 

https://apps.who.int/gpmb/

 

I went through archives to see if I could figure out when that might have happened. On May 20, he was on the board. On May 24, he wasn't. That's as close as I can determine it.

 

The GPMB put out a statement on May 21, but there is no mention of Anthony Fauci's departure.

 

https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/pdf/GPMB_Statement_ahead_of_the_World_Health_Assembly_21_May.pdf

 

There is no mention of him in the June 23 memo, either. The sense of panic in this memo is palpable.

 

https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/pdf/GPMB%20Statement_G7_WHA_G20_210623.pdf

Anonymous ID: 9eb4dc Aug. 12, 2021, 11:45 p.m. No.14342581   🗄️.is 🔗kun

It looks like Tom Frieden just proved the scam. I really don't need to go much beyond the title on this one. The title says the most important thing.

 

I know Tom Frieden has ties to the scam. Are both authors players in the scam? That, I don't know.

 

"After 2020, pandemic preparedness budget cuts should be unthinkable"

by Dr. Tom Frieden and Sen. Tom Daschle — 07/20/21

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/563836-after-2020-pandemic-preparedness-budget-cuts-should-be-unthinkable

 

Tom Frieden is former director of the CDC, president and CEO of Resolve to Save Lives, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

 

https://resolvetosavelives.org/

 

https://www.cfr.org/expert/tom-frieden

 

Why the title of the above article is of concern:

 

Quote from Peter Daszak, March 27, 2015:

 

"Until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs [medical countermeasures] such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process."

 

Did he really suggest creating a crisis and getting the media to cooperate in publicize it in order to get people to invest in MCMs?

Did anyone else at that meeting take that statement seriously enough to actually do something about it?

 

The quote is from:

Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses. Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases: Enabling Sustainable Capabilities Through Ongoing Public- and Private-Sector Partnerships: Workshop Summary.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK349040/

Anonymous ID: 9eb4dc Aug. 12, 2021, 11:57 p.m. No.14342616   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2622 >>2653

>>14342499

I've gotten a couple of (You)s from Q myself. It's an unusual feeling, especially when the (You) actually contributed something. I had a Q-based off-board project for a while. I took it down because I was working a reformat of it. Life happened right about then. Fortunately, other projects filled in and did at least some of what I was trying to accomplish, so I don't feel so bad that I couldn't keep up. I've got another project now somewhat related but not Q based. (Q hasn't been around for a while.)

Anonymous ID: 9eb4dc Aug. 13, 2021, 12:10 a.m. No.14342646   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2652

>>14342615

That word "solidarity" came up in Peter Daszak's CYA statement to The Lancet. One of the email drops suggested that China wanted the statement.

 

And, the word was used in the name of the WHO's HCQ debunking study in which those receiving HCQ were overdosed.

 

“Statement in Support of the Scientists, Public Health Professionals, and Medical Professionals of China Combatting COVID-19.” The Lancet 395 (10226): e42–43.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9

 

“Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for COVID-19 –Interim WHO SOLIDARITY Trial Results.” MedRxiv, October, 2020.10.15.20209817.

https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.15.20209817

 

“WHO R&D Blueprint, COVID-19: Therapeutics Working Group Consultation on the Potential Role of Chloroquine in Clinical Management.” Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

https://www.who.int/blueprint/priority-diseases/key-action/RD-Blueprint-expert-group-on-CQ-call-Mar-13-2020.pdf

 

“Doctors Poisoned Test Patients to Falsely Show That Hydroxychloroquine Is Not Safe and Effective.” Great Mountain Publishing.

https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2021/02/15/doctors-poisoned-test-patients-to-falsely-show-that-hydroxychloroquine-is-not-safe-and-effective/

Anonymous ID: 9eb4dc Aug. 13, 2021, 12:21 a.m. No.14342674   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2709 >>2930

>>14342615

Someone needs to let these people know that the science isn't favoring the vaccine right now.

 

I did some math with the number from the CMS that a whistleblower gave. They said 45,000 died in the first three days after getting a vaccine. That's all-cause, mind you, and just those on Medicare and Medicaid. I found a chart showing similar numbers from that source in June. That chart showed deaths 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 days post jab. There could easily be 500,000 to 1,000,000 or more deaths now. Whoever is trying to hide the numbers is doing such a good job that the GPMB doesn't seem to have noticed.