Anonymous ID: 3225b8 May 16, 2018, 2:26 p.m. No.1434812   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4933

>>1434525

i'll play along because why not.

 

i don't want the connection ignored - i brought it up in the first place…the JJ post was odd, and Q beelined for it.

 

"it appears to be the same as Jean's story" is in reference to your first shilly response, in which you did not cite the wiki page, nor cap the title…just a highlight with Juncker in it, intentionally obfuscating the Jean part.

 

the statement, for you alone, was that your cap appeared to be from Jean's wiki page.

 

the email addy embedded in the post was for someone else, period. why did Q use it? no idea, but there it is. JJ in the post, JJ in the freedom caucus, and John/Jean Juncker is out there.

 

perhaps it's just more of the plausible deniability, intentional dual-meaning vagueness…but i assure you, the man who owns that email addy and the fucking president of the EC are two different people.

 

(it's a great rabbit hole though - and so now i challenge you to prove it. show me, with details how John and Jean connect, and i'll give you a gold star)