What if claims of consistency require infinite incompleteness?
Information weaponised?
Use 'classified' status to hide illegal activities?
FVEY agree to spy on each other's citizens to skirt local privacy laws?
Deleting SQL Server configurations?
"Do not speak of 'toxic positivity' because it will make the world worse"
Adding 'toxic' to the word positivity is designed as an association mechanism to include in thinking that positivity is toxic.
Dividing humanity into toxic positive and toxic negative.
If toxic positivity is proved true and is also presented as a complete explanation of someone's behavior, then toxic negativity is also proved true out of the same language.
Toxic negativity is when a person is made to feel inherently bad for feeling not okay about what they're pressured into believing is ok such that to disagree makes one the cause for why there was a division of logic in the first place between accuser and accused.
It's okay to not be okay, and it's okay to be okay.
It's okay to QUESTION what we see.
It's okay to ask where did the flu numbers go?