Anonymous ID: c67ec7 Aug. 15, 2021, 1:53 p.m. No.14361352   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1384 >>1396 >>1406 >>1422 >>1659 >>1845 >>1956 >>2070

PB

>>14361309

 

>keyword search : afghanistan

 

>https://qanon.pub/?q=afghanistan

 

only 2 posts

 

 

1187

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4884bc No.2613737 📁

Aug 15 2018 14:51:29 (EST)

Anonymous ID: a407ce No.2613023 📁

Aug 15 2018 14:12:01 (EST)

3694F308-70BE-438F-B39D-47C40BD53ACD.jpeg⬇

 

New Sara Carter on Somalia and Yemen

relevant to latest Q

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1029806224412430336?s=20📁

>>2613023

Has intel been shared w/ our enemies in an effort to warn them against capture/kill?

How long did it take to locate/kill UBL?

How many times did we locate UBL in the past and stand down orders were given?

Why did the WH put itself in the middle of every OP?

Why did POTUS immediately remove the WH from the CoC military engagement equation?

How has POTUS been able to essentially destroy ISIS within the 1st year of his Presidency but HUSSEIN could not throughout entire term?

What is JB's background?

Muslim by faith?

What is Hussein's background?

Muslim by faith?

What is VJ's background?

Muslim by faith?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/28660📁

Why was the Hussein admin breaking down admin by faith?

Why was the PUBLIC sheltered re: ISIS for so long?

Why was AL-Q deemed the primary adversary vs ISIS?

Do you believe US intel did not 'know' UBL's son was a prominent figure in AL-Q?

If known, no 'live' intel or geo-t to target?

Define C_A regional assets.

Operation Cyclone>Mujahideen/Afghanistan

>>Aiding anti-Soviet resistance

>>Withdrawal of Soviet troops

Control of $800mm+?

Control of weapons?

Control of training?

>>Afghan Arabs>>Haqqani + Hekmatyar

>>UBL [CRITICAL] Allies?

Haqqani + Hekmatyar relations w/ C_A (in_country)?

Dark to LIGHT.

Q

 

Nov 11 2017

135

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: gO/UntOB No.149063400 📁

Nov 11 2017 23:31:13 (EST)

ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS:

Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan

Albania: Bank of Albania

Algeria: Bank of Algeria

Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina

Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia

Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba

Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia

Austria: Austrian National Bank

Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic

Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas

Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain

Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank

Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados

Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus

Belgium: National Bank of Belgium

Belize: Central Bank of Belize

Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)

Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority

Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan

Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia

Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Botswana: Bank of Botswana

Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil

Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank

Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)

Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi

Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia

Came Roon: Bank of Central African States

Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada

Anonymous ID: c67ec7 Aug. 15, 2021, 1:58 p.m. No.14361384   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1390 >>1396 >>1406

>>14361352

 

Define C_A regional assets.

 

Operation Cyclone>Mujahideen/Afghanistan

>>>Afghan Arabs>>Haqqani + Hekmatyar

 

ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS:

 

How long did it take to locate/kill UBL?

 

How many times did we locate UBL in the past and stand down orders were given?

 

Why did the WH put itself in the middle of every OP?

 

Why did POTUS immediately remove the WH from the CoC military engagement equation?

 

How has POTUS been able to essentially destroy ISIS within the 1st year of his Presidency but HUSSEIN could not throughout entire term?

 

What is JB's background?

 

Muslim by faith?

 

What is Hussein's background?

 

Muslim by faith?

 

What is VJ's background?

 

Muslim by faith?

 

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/28660📁

 

Why was the Hussein admin breaking down admin by faith?

 

https://archive.ph/20161203143524/https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/28660

 

 

 

Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan

Anonymous ID: c67ec7 Aug. 15, 2021, 1:58 p.m. No.14361390   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1396 >>1406

>>14361352WikiLeakshttps://archive.ph/1hZjr#selection-707.0-1119.0

Shop Donate Submit

Search

Leaks News About Partners

Return to search

View email

View source

Attachments

 

Fwd: FW: Asian American Candidates, Muslim American Candidates

 

From:gaylesmithgayle@gmail.com

To: john.podesta@gmail.com

Date: 2008-10-17 08:18

Subject: Fwd: FW: Asian American Candidates, Muslim American Candidates

 

 

 

Lists from Preeta attached. I took Mansour Ijaz off the list, way bad idea,

can explain if needed. G

 

-- Forwarded message --

From: Bansal, Preeta D <PBANSAL@skadden.com>

Date: Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:01 PM

Subject: FW: Asian American Candidates, Muslim American Candidates

To: John Podesta <jpodesta@americanprogress.org>, Gayle Smith <

gaylesmithgayle@gmail.com>

 

FYI also.

 

________

 

From: Bansal, Preeta D (NYC)

Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 11:01 PM

To: Froman, Michael B

Cc: 'Onek, Matthew'

Subject: Asian American Candidates, Muslim American Candidates

 

Here are the compiled lists of Asian American and Muslim American

candidates for top Administration jobs, sub-cabinet jobs, and outside

boards/agencies/policy committees. A couple things to note about the list

of Muslim American candidates:

 

1) In the candidates for top jobs, I excluded those with some Arab

American background but who are not Muslim (e.g., George Mitchell). Many

Lebanese Americans, for example, are Christian. In the last list (of

outside boards/commissions), most who are listed appear to be Muslim

American, except that a handful (where noted) may be Arab American but of

uncertain religion (esp. Christian).

 

2) There is only one candidate I thought was a viable one for a

Secretary-level job among the Muslim Americans. That said, on both lists,

there are some very senior people listed in the last category (for outside

boards/commissions) who conceivably could be considered for top jobs. The

very senior people I put on the last list tended not to be terribly

involved in politics or policy, or in the case of some Asian Americans,

had already served in the Clinton and even Carter Administrations and so I

thought we should seek new talent. But there's no magic to some of the

placements. I think the lists are fairly exhaustive, but some of the

people may be moved to other categories.

 

3) High-profile Muslim Americans tend to be the subject of a fair amount

of blogger criticism, and so the individuals on this list would need to be

ESPECIALLY carefully vetted. I suspect some of the people I list would

not survive such a vet – but I do personally know, at least in part,

virtually all of the candidates in the 1st two categories (but I know very

few of those listed for outside boards/commissions).

 

4) I listed the elected Muslim American democratic officials at the end

of the second category, but for various reasons, I didn't think any of

them would necessarily be suitable for an Administration appointment.

Nevertheless, I wanted to flag them for you in case you wanted to evaluate

them further.

 

DOJ list will be coming in the next two days. Judges and USAttorneys will

still take about 10 days. Let me know if the latter are needed sooner.

 

Preeta D. Bansal

Partner

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Four Times Square | New York | 10036-6522

T: 212.735.2198 | F: 917.777.2198

pbansal@skadden.com

 

---------------—

**********

 

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we advise you

that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained

in this message was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used,

for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal

Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions or (ii)

promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related

matters addressed herein.

**********

**********

 

This email and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the

addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or

confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this

email, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of

this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you

receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (212) 735-3000

and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any email, and any

printout thereof.

 

Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their

professional qualifications will be provided upon request.

**********

==

 

 

 

>>14361384

Anonymous ID: c67ec7 Aug. 15, 2021, 2:11 p.m. No.14361496   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1512 >>1531

>>14361489

In one incredible line, Trump says: “Be assured Mrs.Scott, that in this room there are knives sharp enough to cut you to the bone and hearts cold enough to eat yours as hors d’oeuvres.”

 

Bo Derek’s character responds by flirtatiously saying to Trump: “You’re too pretty to be bad.”

 

“You noticed,” Trump says with a smile and this pout that will forever haunt your dreams.

Anonymous ID: c67ec7 Aug. 15, 2021, 2:13 p.m. No.14361512   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1531

>>14361496

>>14361489

 

Trump:

>“Be assured Mrs.Scott, that in this room there are knives sharp enough to cut you to the bone and hearts cold enough to eat yours as hors d’oeuvres.”

 

>Bo Derek’s character responds by flirtatiously saying to Trump: “You’re too pretty to be bad.”

 

>“You noticed,”

Trump says with a smile

and

this pout that will forever haunt your dreams.

Anonymous ID: c67ec7 Aug. 15, 2021, 2:22 p.m. No.14361590   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14361531

>>14361489

 

if walls could talk

 

“The Little Rascals” (1994)

Trump played “Waldo’s Dad”

 

 

look at the cast

child stars

 

olsen twins (mk shit) Rachel Chandler Q crumbs

raven-symone (grew up to be a lez)

whoopi

Anonymous ID: c67ec7 Aug. 15, 2021, 2:53 p.m. No.14361881   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1897 >>1925 >>1933

>>14361848

>>14361790

>>14361837

>>14361827

 

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_clinton27.htm

 

Hillary Clinton has been deemed a sure bet for the White House, as it's widely speculated the inflammatory Donald Trump and socialist-leaning Bernie Sanders stray too far from establishment politics to be truly electable.

 

 

But it wasn't until an examination using Wikileaks searchable archive of Clinton's emails that the establishment's love of the Democratic war-hawk became truly apparent.

 

 

Buried in thousands of the former Secretary of State's emails sent via her personal server, are intimations of her close relationship with the infamous Rothschild banking family and hints for a potential Rockefeller-State partnership.

 

 

Lynn Forester de Rothschild wrote an email on April 18, 2010, in which she tells Hillary she would,

 

"love to catch up" - and "I remain your loyal adoring pal."

 

Clinton responds,

 

"let's make that happen," and signs her response, "Much love, H."

 

On September 23, 2010, Clinton emailed Lynn Forester de Rothschild (an email chain marked by heavy redaction) saying,

 

"I was trying to reach you to tell you and Teddy that I asked Tony Blair to go to Israel as part of our full court press on keeping the Middle East negotiations going…"

 

Rothschild responds, thanking Clinton for,

 

"personally reaching out to us," and adds, "You are the best, and we remain your biggest fans."

 

A January 9, 2012, email discusses a conference on the environment set to take place at Jacob Rothschild's "historic estate, Waddesdon."

 

 

On New Year's Eve 2012, Lynn Forester de Rothschild sent an email to Clinton "praying for" her speedy recovery.

 

"And, my email box is lighting up with all the PUMA's and their 18M prayers for Hillary campaign," states the email, which is signed, "Love, Lynn, Evelyn, Ben and Jake."

 

An email to Clinton, dated October 15, 2009, from Melanne Verveer - former director of Pres. Obama's State Department office for Global Women's Issues and longtime Clinton family insider - states:

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: c67ec7 Aug. 15, 2021, 2:54 p.m. No.14361897   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1925 >>1933

>>14361881

>>14361848

>>14361790

>>14361837

>>14361827

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_clinton27.htm

cont:

 

"Speaking at UNESCO Monday with the new director on the unfinished Beijing agenda [REDACTED] called to say she wants to give us several million dollars to subsidize a fund to give an annual award for innovation in empowering women that would be a rockefeller-State [sic] partnership."

 

Then, on March 10, 2012, Verveer hints at least at a possible locale for Hillary's future endeavors:

 

"I forgot to tell you that Judith Rodin offered you a suite of offices after you leave State for your own use at Rockefeller Fdtn, if you're interested - with no strings attached.

 

 

She also said they'd be happy to provide you with a month at their center in Bellagio if you just want to read and write in a beautiful place."

 

Though none of the emails The Free Thought Project examined appeared overtly damning - thanks, in part, to sometimes heavy redaction - the evidence of Clinton's comfort with the establishment lends credence to theories of her being the 'chosen' candidate.

 

 

Numerous emails evidence Hillary's staff carefully monitoring - and even manipulating - mainstream news outlets as well.

 

 

Lynn F. de Rothschild told Hillary in August 2009 about a fluff piece journalist Les Gelb was eager to pen for Parade Magazine. Other emails show an almost paranoid eye Clinton kept trained on the Tea Party and its journalists and mouthpieces.

 

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: c67ec7 Aug. 15, 2021, 2:57 p.m. No.14361925   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1933

>>14361897

>>14361881

>>14361848

>>14361790

>>14361837

>>14361827

 

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_clinton27.htm

cont:

 

To reiterate, nothing particularly damning in itself was found in this admittedly cursory search - but the relationships these emails document, alone, evidence Hillary's concrete establishment roots.

 

While Trump infuriates the GOP and Sanders' popular support lacks translation into delegate votes, perhaps these documents support the popular theory Hillary Clinton will be the next president - no matter what…

 

Wikileaks Exposes Hillary Clinton

 

…with Gigantic Release of Private Emails and Accuses Facebook for Censoring It

by Arjun Walia

March 21, 2016

 

from Collective-Evolution Website

 

Not long ago, Hillary Clinton was outed for hypocrisy and corruption when 3,000 emails were released from her private email server in late December of 2015.

 

The emails detailed how a violent intervention was not really necessary in Libya, and that the invasion was less about protecting the people from a dictator than it was about money, banking, oil, and preventing African economic sovereignty.

 

Now Clinton has come under fire again, this time for emails she sent while serving as Secretary of State.

 

If you haven't already heard (no mainstream media outlets seem to be acknowledging this), Wikileaks released a searchable archive of 30,322 emails pulled from a private account she was using during this time. The messages have been made easily available and in a searchable format.

 

A few days after this, Wikileaks accused the social media giant Facebook of deliberately censoring and blocking access to the post.

 

Here's what the Anti-Media had to say about the release:

 

The scary, albeit fascinating exposé on who's in bed with whom in the halls of global power has expanded to include Facebook, according to WikiLeaks.

 

The organization has accused the social networking site of censorship, saying Facebook is blocking users' access to the latest Clinton dispatch.

 

The Problem With Politics That Nobody Ever Talks About

 

Countless politicians and presidents have told the world, over and over again, that a 'hidden hand' or 'invisible' government is really in charge, and that this 'shadow' government is free from the law itself, doing whatever it wants while amassing enormous amounts of power and perpetuating the military industrial complex.

 

This unidentified conglomerate controls the entire political process - not heads of state - which is probably why President Rosevelt told us that presidents are “selected, not elected.”

 

Below is a statement from Senator William Jenner, given to Congress in 1954:

 

Today the path to total dictatorship in the U.S. can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by Congress, the President, or the people…

 

We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state. It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government… [and] this ruthless power-seeking elite is a disease of our century.

 

This group is answerable neither to the President, the Congress, nor the courts. It is practically irremovable.

 

(source)

 

Bernie Sanders recently made this point as well, revealing to the American people, in no uncertain terms, how little power presidents truly have:

 

No matter who is elected to be president, that person will not be able to address the enormous problems facing the working families of our own country. They will not be able to succeed because the power of corporate America, the power of Wall Street, the power of campaign donors is so great that no president alone can stand up to them.

 

(source)

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: c67ec7 Aug. 15, 2021, 2:58 p.m. No.14361933   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14361925

>>14361897

>>14361881

>>14361848

>>14361790

>>14361837

>>14361827

 

cont: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_clinton27.htm

 

Unfortunately, the common theory that Democrats and Republicans are merely two wings of the same bird, sharing the same flight path, seems to be holding true.

 

If there is one major problem with this entire political process, it's that it gives us the illusion of democracy.

 

Think about it:

Does voting really make any difference whatsoever?'

 

With the entire American political system lying in the hands of a small group of people and the corporations they run, all held together by the big banks, what good does electing a president who has absolutely no power do?

 

Even if they do have influence, most are bought and paid for by their sponsors, and many engage in activities that are concealed from public knowledge; these Hillary emails are a great example of that.

 

We live in a world of secrecy, one in which transparency efforts like those of Julian Assange and Edward Snowden are condemned.

 

What kind of a democracy is this? The fact is that truth threatens the entire system of control, it threatens the interests of the global elite, and it threatens their ability to keep us quiet.

 

Politics has become a world of secrecy, one in which few citizens have any real idea of what is actually transpiring.

 

 

An increased need for national security has provided the justification for such secrets, and as President Kennedy warned us, this constant, heightened need for security has been seized upon by those who continue to abuse the power it affords them.

 

Dwight Eisenhower also warned us about the massive potential for misplaced power within the military industrial complex.

 

Again, politicians may be able to influence certain pieces of legislature here and there, but ultimately, corporations hold so much power over governmental policy that major legislature is rarely passed through an actually democratic process. Even if it does, it generally favors the big corporations.

 

 

The Trans Pacific Partnership (TTP) is a great example of this. Every single year we experience the same thing - we hear the same promises, we are pounded with false hope, and we then put our desire for change in the hands of others.

 

Electing a president these days is usually a pretty empty gesture.

 

“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.”

 

President Roosevelt

 

(source)